Boies No Longer Sharing Ritzy NYC Address With Malpractice Foe Guo Wengui
David Boies has sold his Sherry-Netherland apartment for $13.6 million.
January 11, 2019 at 02:43 PM
3 minute read
Famed litigator David Boies has sold his Manhattan residence at the Sherry-Netherland, an upscale hotel and co-op apartment building near the southeast corner of Central Park, with the property reportedly fetching nearly $6 million more than he paid for it about a decade ago.
Not so for Boies' Sherry-Netherland neighbor, exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui.
Guo—a onetime client of Boies Schiller Flexner embroiled in multimillion-dollar malpractice and fee litigation with the firm—has been trying, off and on, to sell his penthouse unit in the 38-floor building since 2015, asking as much as $86 million at one point.
As The Real Deal first reported, an anonymous buyer paid $13.6 million for what had been Boies' 35th floor apartment at the Sherry-Netherland, which he purchased in 2009 for $7.75 million. (Boies has a primary residence north of Manhattan in Armonk, New York.) The sale comes as his firm is poised to move its New York office to a building at the newly constructed Hudson Yards project on Manhattan's west side.
The sale means Boies is leaving behind an address he shared with Guo, a real estate tycoon and Chinese dissident who's also known as Miles Kwok, ever since Guo reportedly paid $67.5 million for his 18th floor residence in 2015. But Boies and others at his firm may still rub shoulders with Guo in a Manhattan courtroom.
Between May 2017 and December 2017, Guo had tapped a team at Boies' firm, led by Boies Schiller partner Joshua Schiller, to represent him in a series of litigation matters. But the relationship soured and prompted an arbitration proceeding in which Boies Schiller alleged that Guo owed more than $640,000 in legal fees. Boies Schiller prevailed and, in November, asked a New York state supreme court to uphold an arbitrator's ruling on the fee dispute.
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barry Ostrager ruled in Boies Schiller's favor on Wednesday, awarding the firm a total of $653,837.93 in fees and interest. That judgment came after Guo failed to respond to Boies Schiller's petition to enforce the arbitration award.
Although Guo ignored the arbitration petition, he hasn't backed down. He lodged a complaint in late December seeking $3.06 million in damages for legal malpractice, alleging that the law firm and Schiller—who's the son of Boies Schiller co-founder Jonathan Schiller—were unprofessional during their legal work for Guo. Boies and his firm have denied those allegations, with Boies saying in early January that they were “totally frivolous.”
|Read More:
Boies Schiller Faces $3M Malpractice Suit From Exiled Chinese Billionaire
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250