Bronx Judge Sanctioned for Citing Her Office Title to Cops After Traffic Accident
The decision will likely mean that Justice Shari Michels, who has been elected twice to the New York City Civil Court, will have her status as an acting state Supreme Court justice revoked for two years, according to the Office of Court Administration.
January 11, 2019 at 03:51 PM
5 minute read
An acting state Supreme Court justice in the Bronx was publicly sanctioned on Friday after she repeatedly identified herself to police officers as a judge when she struck their vehicle more than three years ago, according to the state Commission on Judicial Conduct.
The decision will likely mean that Justice Shari Michels, who has been elected twice to the New York City Civil Court, will have her status as an acting state Supreme Court justice revoked for two years, according to the Office of Court Administration.
Michels will, instead, return to sit in New York City Criminal Court. She was elected to the New York City Civil Court in 2006, but was assigned to the criminal court. She was re-elected to the position in 2016.
It's the second time Michels has been under the scrutiny of the judicial conduct commission. She was also admonished after her first election to the court for telling voters she had been endorsed by the New York Times when she had not.
Michels was accused during the more recent investigation by the commission of trying to avoid the consequences of a traffic accident in which she drove into a van carrying four police officers on their way to an assignment at Yankee Stadium. Michels was stopped behind the van at a red light, according to the commission.
When the light changed from red to green, Michels drove forward and hit the back of the van. There were no injuries and no property damage, but an accident report had to be done because a police vehicle was involved, according to the commission.
When the officer driving the van approached Michels, she allegedly immediately told him she was a judge and that there was no damage to either vehicle. She told the officer that since the accident was blocking traffic and no harm was done, they should “just keep it moving,” according to the commission.
The officer took down her information and told her that they had to do an accident report because a police vehicle was involved, but Michels continued to try and persuade the officers that a report wasn't necessary because there were no injuries or damage, the commission said.
At a hearing on the commission's investigation, Michels said she repeatedly identified herself as a judge so the police officers would be convinced she wasn't going to flee the accident if they allowed her to move her vehicle so traffic could continue. She said she regretted the behavior and acknowledged that identifying herself as a judge “could be perceived as even threatening.”
She also testified that she did not attempt to “convince” or “persuade” the police to forgo doing an accident report. She said she only brought it up to understand why one had to be made when there were no injuries or damage.
There were apparently other claims made by the officers on Michels' conduct that were not included in the commission's public documents. Those claims were rejected, according to David Godosky, an attorney with Godosky & Gentile, who represented Michels before the commission.
“We reviewed the commission's determination and we can state we are definitely gratified that the commission and the referee rejected the claims that were disputed in this matter,” Godosky said. “And we are pleased to have this resolved with the commission's lowest possible sanction.”
Robert Tembeckjian, the administrator of the commission, said Michels' alleged actions undermined the public confidence in her ability to serve on the bench.
“It is wrong for a judge to seek a private benefit or special treatment by proclaiming she is a judge, and wrong to pressure police officers or other public servants from performing their duties,” Tembeckjian said. “The resulting harm to public confidence in the judiciary is significant, even where the underlying event is a relatively minor traffic accident.”
Michels is currently presiding over a criminal trial in Bronx Supreme Court, but the Office of Court Administration said a decision regarding her status as an acting state Supreme Court justice will be evaluated when that trial has wrapped up. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, that status will be revoked for two years, according to OCA.
That will involve a pay cut. Her current salary as an acting justice of the state Supreme Court is $208,000. That will drop to $193,500 if she returns to sit in the New York City Criminal Court.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250