Leadership in the Face of an Estate Tax Mismatch
Katie Lynagh, Member of the NYSBA Trusts & Estates Law Section, writes: Looking forward to 2019, the Section remains dedicated to responding to changes in the law, advancing legislation in our practice area, collaborating with other Sections on shared priorities, and strengthening our members' practices through knowledge sharing.
January 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM
3 minute read
Trusts and estates practitioners are well accustomed to responding to new developments in the law, and 2018 was no exception. The federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed into law on Dec. 22, 2017, introduced major changes to the federal lifetime estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer (GST) taxes, as well as the income taxation of individuals, partnerships, and corporations. For trusts and estates practitioners, perhaps the most significant change is that the legislation doubled the federal lifetime estate, gift, and GST tax exemptions, which are inflation-adjusted, from $5.49 million in 2017 to $11.18 million in 2018. The federal lifetime exemption for 2019 is $11.4 million per person. On Jan. 1, 2026, the exemption will revert to the prior level of $5 million per person, adjusted for inflation since 2010.
New York's estate tax exemption amount is not affected by the federal tax legislation. The New York exemption amount for dates of death in 2019 is $5.74 million per person. As a result of the federal tax legislation, many New York estates are subject to state estate tax but not federal estate tax. Estate planning documents often include formula dispositions that are based on the federal exemption amount and the higher federal exemption amount may affect how these documents operate, potentially triggering unanticipated New York estate tax or causing beneficiaries to receive amounts that differ from the testator's intentions. The problem is especially acute given that the benefit of the New York exemption amount phases out and is lost entirely if the taxable estate exceeds 105 percent of the New York exemption amount. The Trusts and Estates Law Section has responded to the significant mismatch between the exemption amounts by developing legislative proposals that would adjust the New York exemption amount and modify the way that formula bequests are interpreted.
While the tax law changes garnered a great deal of attention in 2018, trusts and estates practitioners continue to remain focused on advising clients on traditional issues such as the division of assets, charitable giving, planning for business succession, and preparing for disability and/or incapacity. In 2018, the Section supported members' professional development by conducting CLE programs on a wide variety of topics, including best practices for powers of attorney, family vacation home ownership strategies, protecting assets from creditors and long-term care expenses, planning for art collections, and the modification of existing trusts.
Our Section's committees develop legislation to solve issues confronted by practitioners and our clients and provide practitioners with a forum for professional collaboration. Three of the Section's legislative proposals were signed into law in 2018. We are continuing our work on a number of important legislative initiatives, including a long-term project that ensures that New York statutes remain on the forefront of modern advances in our area of practice.
Looking forward to 2019, the Trusts and Estates Law Section remains dedicated to responding to changes in the law, advancing legislation in our practice area, collaborating with other Sections on shared priorities, and strengthening our members' practices through knowledge sharing.
Katie Lynagh is an associate in the trusts and estates department of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy. She is the incoming chair of the Section's Estate and Trust Administration Committee.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250