Mediation Preparation Tips for In-House Counsel to Enhance Success
Elizabeth J. Shampnoi, Chair of the NYSBA Corporate Counsel Section, writes: The traditional benefits of mediation such as time and cost savings are widely known. Often more important to companies, however, is the ability to customize a process that best meets their needs and avoid the uncertainties of litigation.
January 11, 2019 at 11:21 AM
4 minute read
Mediation is increasingly being utilized by companies for early, efficient and faster resolution of disputes. Mediation may occur pre-litigation, during litigation and after appeal. Recognizing the benefits of mediation, many courts now require mandatory mediation. The traditional benefits of mediation such as time and cost savings are widely known. Often more important to companies, however, is the ability to customize a process that best meets their needs and avoid the uncertainties of litigation. Additionally, mediation allows the parties to consider creative solutions not available in litigation.
Preparation is key to the success of any mediation. Whether handling the matter internally or working with outside counsel, spending time to prepare increases productivity in the mediation. All involved must understand how the process works and strategize how to approach the mediation. Identifying goals and outlining a path to achieve those goals while maintaining flexibility will help increase success.
Key considerations include: an analysis of your best-case, worst-case and likely alternative to a negotiated resolution; what negotiation style and strategy will be implemented; who is going to take the lead role; what information will you share—and when—to persuade the other party of the strengths in your argument. It is imperative that you outline the critical issues as well as the strengths and weaknesses of your case and do the same from the other party's perspective to anticipate their arguments. This will make for rational decision-making. Prepared parties also have greater credibility all around.
Best practice dictates that counsel be prepared to provide key facts and evidentiary support for the claim and those that undermine the opposing party's claim. Counsel should have available sufficient information so that the mediator and opposing party may objectively understand your position. Effective mediation advocacy requires focusing on information that truly matters but with objectivity. Counsel must be able to acknowledge the strengths in the opposing party's claim. Anticipating the opposing arguments and facts, being prepared to explain why those facts are not supported or of little consequence, will lead to a greater chance of resolution.
A few other preparation tips include: understanding and sharing with the mediator the relationship between counsel; prior and potential future dealings between the parties; and the personalities of all involved because mediation is not strictly about numbers—it involves emotion too. It is important to share as much information as possible with the mediator in advance. Speaking to the mediator privately in advance is encouraged to save time the day of the mediation. Counsel should build rapport with the mediator and be upfront. This allows the mediator to be more effective. It is almost important to determine whether it will add value to begin in joint session, with mediator opening remarks followed by opening remarks from counsel and/or the parties. Opening remarks are often an opportunity to persuade and speak directly to the other party without having those remarks filtered by counsel. Remarks should be prepared ahead of time, demonstrate a willingness to listen, and be conciliatory consistent with the spirit of mediation. Opening remarks if not carefully crafted can also inflame the situation so careful consideration and preparation is required.
Investing adequate time to prepare for mediation will enhance the likelihood of success. In the event the mediation is not successful, in-house counsel's preparation time is still well spent because the foundation will be laid from which to build for future negotiations or litigation preparation.
Elizabeth J. Shampnoi is president of Shampnoi Dispute Resolution and Management Services and serves as a mediator, arbitrator, consulting expert and trainer. She works with in-house counsel, law firms, and executives providing strategic advice to develop and implement ADR programs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Says Global Clients Are Noticing ‘Expanded Capacity’ After Kramer Merger in Paris
- 2'Reverse Robin Hood': Capital One Swarmed With Class Actions Alleging Theft of Influencer Commissions in January
- 3Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
- 4How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 5Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250