Benjamin Brafman Is Seeking to Drop Harvey Weinstein as a Client, Source Says
Benjamin Brafman is preparing to ask a New York Supreme Court justice to permit him to withdraw as counsel for Harvey Weinstein in the disgraced movie mogul's sexual assault case, according to a source with knowledge of the matter.
January 14, 2019 at 02:34 PM
3 minute read
Benjamin Brafman is preparing to ask a New York Supreme Court justice to permit him to withdraw as counsel for Harvey Weinstein in the disgraced movie mogul's sexual assault case, according to a source with knowledge of the matter.
Weinstein stands accused of two counts of predatory sexual assault, which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison, as well as counts of first-degree criminal sexual act, first-degree rape and third-degree rape.
Brafman of Brafman & Associates, who declined to comment, has not yet filed to withdraw, according to a source. Weinstein's case is scheduled to go to trial in May and a pretrial conference has been scheduled for March 7, according to the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.
Brafman will need approval from Acting Manhattan Supreme Court Justice James Burke to withdraw from the case.
Brafman was successful in beating a sixth charge against Weinstein, first-degree criminal sexual act, after it was revealed that the New York City police detective that led the investigation into Weinstein did not tell prosecutors from the Manhattan District Attorney's Office that a witness who gave an account of Weinstein's alleged sexual assault of Lucia Evans in 2004 contradicted what Evans told police.
But Weinstein's legal team failed in its subsequent bid to get the rest of his charges dismissed, in which they alleged that prosecutors failed to present evidence to a grand jury that Weinstein maintained consensual relationships with his accusers.
Burke found that the grand jury proceedings, for which Weinstein declined to testify, were conducted properly and that the dismissal of the charges relating to Lucia Evans had no bearing on the charges pertaining to the other accusers.
The judge also said there was no basis for allegations by Weinstein's attorneys that Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. bowed to political pressure in deciding to bring the case against Weinstein.
The news that Brafman is seeking to withdraw as counsel in the case comes days after reports that the prominent criminal defense attorney, whose star-studded clientele has included Sean Combs and Martin Shkreli, clashed with Weinstein and that Weinstein has been shopping around for a new attorney.
The New York Post reported Sunday night that reports of Weinstein seeking to expand his legal team took Brafman by surprise. Citing unnamed sources, the Los Angeles Times reported Monday that Weinstein had pushed his attorneys to take a more aggressive approach to clear his name.
The two remaining accusers in the case are Mimi Haleyi, a production assistant who says the producer forced himself on her in 2006, and an accuser who is unnamed in court filings who says that Weinstein assaulted her in 2013.
Prosecutors say that the detective, Nicholas DiGaudio, also told the accuser from 2013 to delete files from cellphones that were turned in as evidence.
Read more:
Weinstein Seeks Stay of Federal Civil Suits Pending NY Criminal Trial
Judge Denies Weinstein's Motion to Dismiss Remaining Sexual Assault Charges
What It's Like to Be Ben Brafman: Confessions From a Big-Time Criminal Defense Lawyer
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Trial Court's Sidestep of 'Batson' Deprived Defendant of Challenge to Jury Discrimination
Decision of the Day: Commercial Division Finds Defendant Engaged in Unfair Competition Against Plaintiff
Decision of the Day: Court Rules on Judgment Motions Over Police Killing of Pet Dog While Executing Warrant
Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250