NY Legislators Approve Measures to Ease Voting, Curb Corporate Donations
It was also the first time in eight years that a Democrat presided over a meeting of the State Senate Judiciary Committee.
January 14, 2019 at 08:48 PM
6 minute read
The state Legislature approved a package of voting and election law reforms Monday, receiving applause from legal groups that supported the reforms ahead of this year's legislative session.
It was also the first time in eight years that a Democrat presided over a meeting of the State Senate Judiciary Committee, whose members approved two resolutions that would allow voters to decide whether the state constitution should be changed to enact same-day voter registration and no-excuse absentee voting.
The overall legislative package includes several different priorities that Democrats in the Legislature have supported for several years, all of which are intended to increase voter turnout in New York.
The bills would allow early voting in the state ten days before an election and would also consolidate the federal and state primary elections in New York to one date in June. The package also includes measures to allow 16- and 17-year-olds to preregister to vote and automatically carry over a resident's voter registration if they move to a different area of the state.
The single campaign finance bill include in Monday's package would restrict the ability of limited liability companies to donate virtually unlimited amounts to candidates. Under current law, those companies can evade regular contribution limits because of a decades-old decision by the state board of elections.
The bill approved by lawmakers Monday would limit political donations by those companies to $5,000 for a candidate, which is the same amount that applies to corporations. It would also require those companies to disclose the identities of their owners.
Those bills, if approved by Cuomo, will take effect this year. Two other bills, which would require an amendment to the state's constitution, would not be enacted for at least three years. That's because constitutional amendments require a vote by the current Legislature, the next sitting Legislature, and the state's voters.
The first constitutional amendment would allow residents to register to vote on the same day of an election. The other would allow residents to vote by mail, with an absentee ballot, without having to offer an excuse.
State Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, said having his first meeting as the new chair of the Judiciary Committee be about voting reform was “liberating.”
“It's such a long awaited change in the way we approach our basic, fundamental responsibilities, which is to make it easier for citizens to express their preference at their polling place,” Hoylman said. “You get a sense that in New York they didn't want you to vote.”
The entire package received praise from legal groups around the state, including both the New York State Bar Association and New York City Bar Association. Both groups said earlier this month that voting reform would be a top priority for them for this year's legislative session. New York State Bar Association President Michael Miller echoed his group's support on Monday.
“Measures to remove barriers to registration and voting and to encourage participation—while maintaining the integrity of the process—will go a long way toward improving civic engagement and enhancing our democracy,” Miller said. “Modernizing New York's systems for registration and voting is a legislative priority for the New York State Bar Association, and we commend the Legislature for acting on these important bills as one of its first actions of the new session.”
The New York City Bar Association, which has long favored voting reform, also cheered the package of bills Monday. City Bar President Roger Juan Maldonado said their support is rooted in improving access to elections for New York residents.
“With New York consistently ranking as one of the worst states for voter turnout and growing increasingly out of step with the rest of the country in how it conducts its elections, the need for reform has never been greater,” Maldonado said. “Providing New Yorkers full access to the voting booth without unnecessary hurdles will ensure they can make their voices heard and support policies that best reflect their beliefs.”
Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, also gave his support for the reforms, but also urged the Legislature to continue with the same theme and enact automatic voter registration for state residents. Waldman called for lawmakers to create a system for publicly financed campaigns.
“Today's new laws are a terrific first step to modernize New York's elections. They will make it easier for thousands of New Yorkers to vote and harder for the wealthiest to evade campaign limits,” Waldman said. “This should build momentum for the biggest changes to reform and revitalize our system.”
Republicans in the Legislature pushed back on Monday's voting reforms, pointing to the financial burden they may place on local boards of elections to implement and the potential for voter fraud. Same-day voter registration, for example, may require more staffing to accommodate those requests.
State Sen. Cathy Young, R-Cattaraugus, claimed on the Senate floor that implementing early voting would financially harm upstate counties and asked State Sen. Zellnor Myrie, who chairs the Elections Committee, to justify the cost.
“Does the sponsor believe that the serious disproportionate burdens that this bill imposes on upstate counties is fair?” Young said. She later called the bill an unfunded mandate for county governments.
“We do not feel this is an undue hardship on upstate counties,” Myrie said, pointing to a provision of the early voting bill that would give local boards of elections discretion in setting up early polling places. Myrie also noted that Democrats are confident funding will be included in this year's state budget to address the needs of local governments when implementing voting reforms.
“This is a question about whether or not we are willing to invest in our Democracy,” Myrie said.
Significant changes to the state's laws—especially those that make headlines—are usually included either in the state budget at the end of March or in an omnibus package of bill at the end of June, called the “Big Ugly” in Albany speak. Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins said Monday's package of voting reforms was negotiated largely without input from the Cuomo administration.
“This is a result of the Legislature negotiating,” Stewart-Cousins said. “I think we're all sharing the same agenda, but I think it's clear the Legislature has an opportunity to work together to do what legislatures do: pass bills and put things out for the governor to decide whether or not to veto.”
Cuomo is expected to include additional voting reforms in his state budget address, which he's set to deliver Tuesday afternoon.
READ MORE:
Voting Reform Among Top Legislative Priorities for NY Lawyer Groups
Child Sex Abuse Bill Top Priority for New NY Senate Judiciary Chair
Criminal Justice Reforms More Likely in NY as Democrats Take Office
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 2'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 3Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 4Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
- 5Davis Wright Tremaine Turns to Gen AI To Teach Its Associates Legal Writing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250