FedEx Settles for $35.3 Million with State and City Over Cigarette Shipments
"FedEx knowingly engaged in illegal and harmful behavior at the expense of New Yorkers' health” and it "swindled New York City and State out of millions of dollars in tax revenue,” Attorney General Letitia James said.
January 14, 2019 at 05:06 PM
4 minute read
The New York Attorney General's Office and city Law Department announced a $35.3 million settlement with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. that resolves three lawsuits alleging FedEx teamed up with cigarette trafficking businesses to ship hundreds of thousands of untaxed cigarettes to New Yorkers.
“For years, FedEx knowingly engaged in illegal and harmful behavior at the expense of New Yorkers' health,” Attorney General Letitia James said in the statement. “Not only did FedEx violate laws created to protect the public from the serious health risks associated with cigarettes, but they also swindled New York City and state out of millions of dollars in tax revenue.”
“For the worst of reasons—profit—FedEx shipped millions of untaxed cigarettes to residents throughout the state,” City corporation counsel Zachary Carter said.
FedEx on Monday did not respond to a request for comment.
In their joint statement, the AG's Office and city Law Department said that the settlement recovers “substantially more” than the amount of lost state and city taxes and that those additional amounts represent “in large part, a penalty.”
“FedEx was previously investigated for this same conduct, the conduct was longstanding and pervasive throughout the company, and the conduct had the potential to negatively impact public health,” the offices said in naming some factors, among others, that led to what they called a penalty.
The exact amount of lost taxes was not stated.
The offices—which for years jointly investigated and prosecuted the matter—said that the illegal shipping lasted for some 10 years, and they noted that “the evidence is clear that cigarette taxes are the most effective means of deterring smoking.”
“FedEx's conduct frustrated the public health purpose underlying such taxes—to reduce cigarette smoking,” they said.
The settlement resolves three federal lawsuits, all filed between 2013 and 2017 in the Southern District of New York, according to a separate email from Law Department spokesman Nicholas Paolucci.
Paolucci added that the three suits put forward essentially the same illegal shipping allegations, but addressed cigarette shipments for different FedEx customers. One suit named FedEx Freight as well as FedEx Ground, he said.
In the joint statement, the AG's Office and Law Department also said that settlement comes after an important October 2018 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York.
Ramos found that “FedEx's conduct over many years for customers with such names as 'Cigarettes Direct To You' established without the need for a trial that FedEx had knowingly violated a federal anti-cigarette trafficking statute and a 2006 Assurance of Compliance with the [AG's] Office in which, to avoid prosecution, FedEx expressly agreed to cease residential cigarette deliveries and comply with a New York law prohibiting those deliveries,” the offices said in their statement.
In addition to the $35.3 million payment, the settlement also requires FedEx to both put in place internal reforms and hire an independent consultant to oversee FedEx's compliance with the law and provide compliance reports.
Specifically, according to the statement, FedEx will “cease domestic shipments of tobacco products, including cigarettes (with limited exceptions set forth in the settlement agreement)”; “implement company-wide communications and annual training concerning tobacco shipments, including mandatory notices by employees to company officials if tobacco shipments are discovered”; “take disciplinary action against any employee or contractor who knowingly facilitates tobacco shipments”; and “retain an independent consultant recommended by the city and state to both advise and monitor the company's compliance with the settlement agreement and with federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the shipment of tobacco [and] the consultant will immediately report violations to the city and state and provide quarterly reports.”
The settlement agreement terms will be extended by one year for each year in which there is a material breach of the agreement as determined by a court or special master, the statement also said.
It added that “as New York has increased the tax rate on cigarettes, the number of smokers in New York has sharply declined. According to the World Health Organization, maintaining high taxes on cigarettes is the most effective anti-smoking policy intervention, particularly among youth.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readCravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
Trending Stories
- 1'We Should Be Pragmatic': Meet the Possible Next FTC Chair
- 2Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
- 3Jury That Convicted Ex-Sen. Robert Menendez Accidentally Saw Improper Evidence, Prosecutors Say
- 4Freshfields Hires DOJ Official, Squire Taps Paul Hastings Atty for US Antitrust Head
- 5Goodbye 'Yellow Freight' Road?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250