Cuomo Details Marijuana Legalization, Criminal Justice Reform in NY Budget Speech
The budget also proposes increasing the Attorney Registration Fee and Criminal History Search Fee by $50 each in an effort to support indigent legal services statewide.
January 15, 2019 at 03:51 PM
7 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo unveiled a sweeping package of criminal justice reforms during his State of the State and Budget Address in Albany on Tuesday, including an end to cash bail in New York and regulatory framework to legalize marijuana for adults over the age of 21.
His message to the New York Legislature included a $175 billion spending plan that proposes increasing the Attorney Registration Fee and Criminal History Search Fee by $50 each in an effort to support indigent legal services statewide. Those fees would increase to $425 and $90, respectively.
Cuomo's budget included several proposals aimed at reducing pretrial detention waiting periods for defendants through bail, discovery and speedy trial reform—all issues the Legislature plans to act on during this year's legislative session, according to lawmakers.
“This year we're going to eliminate cash bail, we have to enact speedy trial reform, we have to pass discovery reform and we need to do more services for re-entry for this transitioning from incarceration back to the community,” Cuomo said.
State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, D-Bronx, who is chairman of the Codes Committee, said he was glad to see those reforms included in Cuomo's executive budget address.
“I'm excited that the governor has outline these as priorities,” Bailey said. “My colleagues in the Legislature and I, we've been looking at these as matters we'd like to take up ourselves and I'm glad the governor is interested in doing that.”
The first proposal would require police officers to issue appearance tickets to low-level defendants rather than make custodial arrests, which would keep the individual out of police custody until their appearance date.
Cash bail would be eliminated for individuals who do end up in police custody. Instead, a judge would decide whether an individual should be kept in state custody or released. Unless the judge has reason to believe the person cannot safely await trial in their community, that individual would automatically be released on their own recognizance.
The budget would also create a new procedure where prosecutors may move for a hearing to determine whether a defendant should be held in jail before trial. Defendants would be entitled to discovery before those hearings and the burden of proof would be on a prosecutor to convince the judge the individual should be kept in state custody.
The judge would have to conclude at the end of the hearing that there is reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the crime and that the person presents a threat to the public or has failed to appear in court initially.
Cuomo's plan for discovery reform is less detailed in terms of deadlines. Prosecutors and defense attorneys will be required to share all information in their possession well in advance of trial, according to the budget, but an exact deadline is not spelled out. If a defendant is considering pleading guilty to a crime, rather than go to trial, they would also be allowed to review every piece of evidence prosecutors currently have in their possession against them.
If a prosecutor believes that victims or witnesses could be endangered through discovery, they would be allowed to petition a court for a protective order for those individuals. That would shield the identifying information of those individuals when necessary if granted.
On speedy trial reform, Cuomo's budget includes a proposal that would allow the court to inquire into a prosecutor's so-called “readiness” to proceed to trial. A statement of “readiness,” which allows a judge to schedule a trial in New York, would only be accepted if prosecutors have filed all the appropriate paperwork. Prosecutors would also be prohibited from proceeding to trial until a defendant has been provided all the information in the case against them.
Cuomo also proposed a series of sweeping changes to reform grand jury proceedings in New York. Under current state law, any witness who testifies before a grand jury proceeding is automatically granted transactional immunity from being prosecuted unless they waive that privilege.
Cuomo's proposal would, instead, grant those witnesses “use” immunity. That would prevent prosecutors from using their statements before a grand jury to later charge them, but it would not make them immune from charges altogether.
The budget would also remove certain barriers for individuals who seek to reintegrate into their communities after being arrested or released from prison. One proposal would prevent mugshots from being shared unless there's a specific need by law enforcement. Another would prevent past arrest information from appearing on a person's criminal history report, often sought by potential employers, if that arrest didn't result in a conviction.
Among the most closely watched issues this year is the legalization of adult-use marijuana, which Cuomo is publicly supporting for the first time this year. His support came after a report from the state Department of Health recommended legalization based on the revenue and criminal justice benefits.
Cuomo's budget would create a new state office to develop and implement a regulatory framework for marijuana legalization in New York. The Office of Cannabis Management, as it's called in the budget, would be responsible for licensing growers and sellers, enforcing the state's laws and regulations, and handling the economic development consequences of legalization. The office will also handle the medical marijuana program and the state's industrial hemp market.
Licenses will be issued for producers, distributors and retailers, according to the budget. The number of producers and retail dispensaries will be limited, though a number was not included in the budget. The limit is intended to prevent the legalized marijuana market from collapsing on itself, the budget said.
The proposal would also automatically seal certain cannabis-related criminal records, though details on what level of offenses would be eligible were not included. Counties and large cities would be allowed to opt out of having retail marijuana shops under the proposal, which Cuomo expects would generate about $300 million in tax revenue statewide over three years.
Legalized marijuana would only be available to consumers age 21 or older. The state would also be responsible for implementing and monitoring standards for the quality and safety of retail marijuana, according to the budget.
State lawmakers will begin holding hearings on Cuomo's proposals later this month, though they have indicated that some reforms may be passed outside the budget. Lawmakers, this week, approved several reforms to the state's voting laws, which Cuomo was planning on including in budget negotiations.
A final spending plan for the state is due at the end of March. There's new pressure this year for lawmakers to pass an on-time spending plan. Under an order from a state committee last month, state lawmakers will not receive a pay raise next year if they do not pass a budget by the start of the next fiscal year, which begins April 1.
READ MORE:
NY Lawmakers Fret How Legal Marijuana May Complicate Motor Vehicle Law
Cuomo, Legislative Leaders Renew Support for Child Sex Abuse, Criminal Justice Measures
NY Lawmakers, Attorneys Propose New Ethics Watchdog Modeled on Judicial Conduct Monitor
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250