Scott E. Mollen
Commercial Landlord—Tenant-Lease Option to Renew Lacked Essential Element-Void and Unenforceable—Doctrine of Definiteness
A defendant landlord had moved for summary judgment on several counterclaims, arguing that there are no triable issues of fact “regarding the expiration of the lease and that a valid option to renew did not exist.” The landlord sought “use and occupancy,” attorney fees, a final judgment of possession and issuance of a warrant of eviction. It also sought dismissal of several of the tenant’s causes of action and affirmative defenses. The tenant opposed the landlord’s motions and cross-moved for summary judgment on its causes of action and for dismissal of the landlord’s counter-claims.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
