Retired NY Appellate, COA Judges Launch Arbitration Venture
"People who send their clients to arbitration are really worried that they're going to run across arbitrators who are not enforcing the law," Saxe said. "That's why it's very important to have an arbitrator with a fealty to the law who hews to legal precedent."
January 15, 2019 at 05:14 PM
3 minute read
Nine former New York Court of Appeals and appellate judges are offering their services as arbitrators in commercial cases as part of a joint venture that is officially being launched this week.
The network, founded by retired Appellate Division, First Department Justices David Saxe and James Catterson, is unique because everyone in it has appellate and trial experience. The advantage of the judges-only network is that lawyers selecting arbitrators have access to extensive written opinions that provide insight into the judges' legal reasoning, Saxe said.
“People who send their clients to arbitration are really worried that they're going to run across arbitrators who are not enforcing the law,” Saxe said. “That's why it's very important to have an arbitrator with a fealty to the law who hews to legal precedent.”
“Appellate judges spend their career looking over decisions that come to them from the lower court. They're not in the business of taking chances,” he said.
Rick Andrias, who retired from the appellate court three months ago and is joining the network as a principal, said he was involved in 700 to 800 cases a year at the First Department. “We're known quantities by litigators,” he said.
The network, which the judges are calling ADAM or Appellate Division Arbitrators & Mediators, was an outgrowth of Saxe's and Catterson's common experiences. Saxe found that lawyers at Morrison Cohen where he is now a partner were always asking about the arbitrators offered by the larger networks such as JAMS or NAM because they didn't know enough about any of them.
“Oddly enough although David and I are at different firms, I also get the exact same inquiries every day,” said Catterson, who became a partner at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer after retiring.
And inevitably, he said, no one at Arnold & Porter knew enough about the prospective arbitrators to select one.
Saxe and Catterson decided against joining JAMS or NAM because the arrangement wouldn't have been as favorable financially or allowed them to handle as many other matters. Instead, they retained Resolute Systems to handle the back-office operations and provide office space. As partners, the revenue they earn goes to their firms.
Aware of the need for diversity, the founders reached out to retired female judges to see if any would be interested in joining. Three women took them up on it: Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, Victoria Graffeo and Susan Phillips, all retired from the Court of Appeals. Barry Cozier, a retired Second Department justice who is part of ADAM, is African-American. Retired Court of Appeals Judges Howard Levine and Joseph Covello are also part of the venture.
Lack of diversity has been an issue in alternative dispute resolution. Data from a 2014 American Bar Association Dispute Resolution Section survey indicated that for cases with between $1 million and $10 million, 82 percent of neutrals and 89 percent of arbitrators were men (Brown & Schneider, 2014). Studies since haven't shown much progress.
“We sought out people from diverse backgrounds that we knew and respected,” Andrias noted. “We wanted diversity so people could choose whoever fit their particular needs.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 2Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 3'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 4Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 5A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250