NYC Adds Sackler Family Members as Purdue Pharma Owners to Opioids Lawsuit
The New York City government has expanded its lawsuit against pharmaceutical distributors over the opioid epidemic that has impacted communities across the U.S. to include members of the Sackler family, which owns Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin and a group of major retailers.
January 16, 2019 at 06:38 PM
4 minute read
The New York City government has expanded its lawsuit against pharmaceutical distributors over the opioid epidemic that has impacted communities across the U.S. to include members of the Sackler family, which owns Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin and a group of major retailers.
The city alleges that the Sacklers knew about the risks of OxyContin no later than the summer of 1999 after a Purdue sales representative reported widespread use of the drug, but that members of the family took part in a conspiracy to downplay the risks associated with the drug that included the use of self-destructing emails.
The retailers added to the city's suit, which is consolidated with dozens of similar suits filed by other local governments across New York State in Suffolk County Supreme Court, include CVS, Rite-Aid, Walgreens and Walmart.
The Sacklers are also defendants in the Suffolk County government's opioids suit. The retail defendants are also named in the sprawling multi-district prescription drug litigation playing out in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
In a news release, Paul Hanly Jr., a shareholder of Simmons Hanly Conroy who represents the city and other governments that are suing over the opioid epidemic, said the Sacklers were enriched by the fact that many were not aware of the risks of using Purdue's prescription painkillers.
“The Sacklers, through their business dealings and ownership of Purdue, have manufactured, promoted and recklessly marketed opioids by omitting critical information that could have saved thousands of lives, communities and families if known sooner,” Hanly said.
A spokesman for the Sackler family referred questions to Purdue.
According to the suit, a Purdue employee conducted research into OxyContin abuse in 1999 and found that users were removing the coating from OxyContin pills and snorting, cooking or injecting them.
The employee's findings were included in a memo that were sent to the top brass at Purdue, the city alleges, which included Richard, Jonathan and Kathe Sackler, who sit on Purdue's board of directors.
The city also alleges that members of the family made efforts to downplay the addictiveness of oxycodone and that board members engaged in a sales strategy to get patients to use increasingly larger doses of opioids.
The city alleges that more than 1,000 New Yorkers died in 2016 from an opioid-related drug overdose.
In addition to the Sackler family's ownership of a drug company that has become the target of state and local governments claiming that opioids killed or destroyed the lives of residents and usurped public resources, the family is known for its prolific philanthropic pursuits.
In New York, the Sackler name adorns a wing of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, an institute for developmental psychobiology at Columbia University and a laboratory at the American Natural History Museum.
The city filed papers to expand the field of defendants Wednesday, one day after the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office filed papers in its suit against Purdue and the Sacklers took a hands-on role in suppressing information reports about OxyContin's potential for abuse.
In 2007, Purdue and three of its top executives pleaded guilty to criminal charges that they misled patients, doctors and regulators about the dangers associated with the drug agreed to pay more than $630 million in fines and other costs.
Read more:
NY Opioid Surcharge Law Struck Down by Federal Judge as Unconstitutional
The Developing Right to Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in Jails and Prisons
NY State Urges Opioid Distributors' Challenge to Surcharge Be Moved Out of Federal Court
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readDecision of the Day: Judge Rules Brutality Claims Against Hudson Valley Police Officer to Proceed to Trial
Skadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 2'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 3Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 4After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 5People in the News—Jan. 23, 2025—Marshall Dennehey, Duane Morris, Hangley Aronchick
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250