Walgreens Agrees to $269M Payment to Settle Health Care Fraud Suits
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced the company agreed to the settlement over allegations of over-billing federal programs for insulin and other medications.
January 22, 2019 at 06:19 PM
3 minute read
Walgreens has entered into an agreement with federal prosecutors in Manhattan to settle Medicaid and Medicare fraud allegations in two separate actions brought against the national pharmacy chain, according to court records unsealed by U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty of the Southern District of New York Tuesday.
The company agreed to pay more than $209 million to resolved that it improperly billed federal health care programs for hundreds of thousands of insulin pens provided to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries who did not need the diabetes medication. Additionally, Walgreen's agreed to a $60 million payment for overbilling Medicaid for medications offered to consumers through a discount program.
“Medicare and Medicaid provide essential healthcare coverage to millions of people across this country. The financial integrity of these programs depends on truthful and accurate billing by pharmacies like Walgreens,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said in a statement. “Overbilling and improper billing of Medicare and Medicaid unduly burden taxpayers and put the solvency of these vital healthcare programs at risk.”
According to federal prosecutors, the insulin fraud occurred through two specific Walgreens policies. First, the company's electronic management system prevented pharmacists from dispensing partial boxes of insulin pens, even when a patient didn't require that much insulin. Second, when the amount distributed exceeded what was prescribed for a total number of daily doses, Walgreens falsely stated in reimbursement forms that what was handed out didn't go over that limit.
As part of the other fraudulent scheme, Walgreens used its Prescription Savings Program to overcharge federal health care programs, according to prosecutors. While it was providing customers a discount on drugs ordered through the program, Walgreens was failing to tell Medicaid what the prices were when it billed for reimbursement. This led to Medicaid paying more than it should have for the discounted medications.
As part of the settlement, New York State will receive a total of $14.5 million. Both fraud suits arose from two separate federal qui tam whistleblower suits against Walgreens.
In a statement provided by a Walgreens spokesman, the company said it was pleased to have the issues resolved. The company claimed to have fully cooperated with the government, and to have admitted to no wrongdoing. According to federal prosecutors, the company “admitted and accepted responsibility for conduct the Government alleged in its complaints under the False Claims Act.”
“Walgreens is a company of pharmacists living and working in the communities we serve, and we have always taken the safety and reliability of the medicines our patients need very seriously. We are resolving these matters because we believe it is in the best interest of our customers, patients and other stakeholders to move forward,” the company statement read.
Related:
The False Claims Act: A Powerful Tool Against Federal Health Care Program Fraud
NYC Adds Sackler Family Members as Purdue Pharma Owners to Opioids Lawsuit
Next Tactic in Battle to Lower Drug Prices: Litigation?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says
Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
4 minute read'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
Trending Stories
- 1State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
- 2Selendy Gay Files Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Workforce Reclassification EO
- 3Trump's DOJ Withdraws Opposition to Law Banning Trans Care for Minors
- 4Perkins Coie Backs Challenge to Trump's Ban on Transgender Military Service
- 5New Charges Expected in Sex Trafficking Case Against Broker Brothers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250