Harvey Weinstein Assembles High-Profile, Non-NY Lawyers for New Defense Team
Weinstein, who faces five criminal counts relating to two accusers who say the fallen movie mogul assaulted them in 2006 and 2013, has tapped Jose Baez and Ronald Sullivan Jr. of the Orlando, Florida-based Baez Law Firm to join his defense team, the firm said in an email.
January 23, 2019 at 04:26 PM
5 minute read
Disgraced movie producer Harvey Weinstein is moving forward to trial in his Manhattan sexual assault case with a new legal team that includes attorneys who are not based in New York but who have been successful in defending high-profile clients who had been handed harsh judgments in courts of public opinion.
Weinstein, who faces five criminal counts relating to two accuser who say the fallen movie mogul assaulted them in 2006 and 2013, has tapped Jose Baez and Ronald Sullivan Jr. of the Orlando, Florida-based Baez Law Firm to join his defense team, the firm said in an email.
“Mr. Weinstein steadfastly maintains his innocence in this matter and we are looking forward to assisting Mr. Weinstein in his defense,” Baez said in a statement.
According to news reports, Pamela Mackey of Denver-based Haddon, Morgan and Foreman is also joining Weinstein's defense team. She did not respond to a request for comment.
The announcements of Weinstein's new lawyers come as he prepares to part ways with prominent criminal defense attorney Benjamin Brafman, a move that left some in the legal community scratching their heads given the fact that Brafman successfully cleared Weinstein of another count relating to a third accuser in the case who said that Weinstein assaulted her in 2004.
Brafman still needs approval from acting Manhattan Supreme Court Justice James Burke to officially withdraw from the case.
Baez is best known for securing an acquittal for Casey Anthony, a young mother who was accused of killing her 2-year-old daughter in 2008 and who prosecutors painted as a callous partygoer who sought to free herself from the obligations of motherhood.
Following a 2011 trial that attracted widespread attention, in which Baez contended that the child died in a swimming pool and that her rattled parents attempted to hide the body, a jury found Anthony not guilty of murder.
Baez and Sullivan have also represented actress Rose McGowan, who has in media statements accused Weinstein of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s. Baez represented McGowan in a Virginia cocaine possession case beginning in 2018. According to the Daily Beast, McGowan called their representation of Weinstein a “major conflict of interest.”
“This is why my case didn't go to trial—my instinct was my lawyers had been bought off,” McGowan told the Daily Beast.
Additionally, Baez and Sullivan, a Harvard Law School professor who previously headed the Brooklyn district attorney's conviction review unit under the late Kenneth Thompson, worked together to secure an acquittal for former NFL player Aaron Hernandez in a double-murder case.
As for Mackey, the Los Angeles-based attorney defended NBA superstar Kobe Bryant when he was accused in 2003 of sexually assaulting a hotel employee. The following year, prosecutors decided to drop the case after the accuser refused to come forward to testify.
Barbara Barron, a professor at the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University who previously worked for the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, said the attorneys' record of success “says it all” in terms of why Weinstein may have picked them for his defense.
Barron also said that bringing new attorneys into the case may also provide fresh perspectives that could prove advantageous for the client.
Mark Bederow of the Law Office of Mark A. Bederow, also a former Manhattan prosecutor who successfully petitioned a state appeals court in Brooklyn to throw out a 15-year-old murder conviction for John Giuca, said that out-of-town attorneys, while they have proven track records, might have a learning curve in terms of getting to know Burke, local procedures and potential jurors from Manhattan. He also said he found it odd that Weinstein would break away from Brafman when it appeared that Brafman was having some success in the case.
“I think it's bizarre given who he is replacing and given how well the defense appeared to be doing,” Bederow said. “But ultimately it's his choice to proceed how he wants and none of us know the reason why the switch was made.”
Weinstein's remaining charges include two counts of predatory sexual assault, first-degree rape, third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act.
A sixth charge, an additional count of first-degree criminal sexual act, was thrown out after the revelation that a New York City police detective had told a witness to withhold an account of the alleged 2004 sexual assault that didn't match up with the accuser's account of the events.
In December, Burke denied a motion to dismiss the five remaining counts against Weinstein.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Judge Precludes Ballistics Expert's Opinion on Scene for 2016 Fatal Police Shooting
Decision of the Day: Contingency Fee to Counsel Result of Successful Advocacy, Not Windfall
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute readDecision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
Trending Stories
- 1Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 2While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 3The Definition of Special Employment
- 4People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 5Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250