Lawmakers Eye Further Steps to Benefit Immigrants as NY 'Dream Act' Approved
Some reforms, including one that would prohibit federal immigration officers from entering state courts with the intention of taking an undocumented immigrant into custody, appear to have gained momentum this year after Democrats took control of both houses in the state Legislature.
January 23, 2019 at 06:18 PM
5 minute read
State legislators in Albany voted to expand opportunities for undocumented immigrants by offering state tuition assistance to those individuals on Wednesday, as lawmakers also hinted at further progressive immigration reforms passing in New York over the next several months.
Some of those reforms, including one that would prohibit federal immigration officers from entering state courts with the intention of taking an undocumented immigrant into custody, appear to have gained momentum this year after Democrats took control of both houses in the state Legislature.
The bill, called the Dream Act, would allow undocumented immigrants to apply to scholarships from scholarship funds and the state's Tuition Assistance Program, which offers funds for low- and middle-income New York residents to pay for college. The program, according to the bill's sponsors, is expected to cost about $27 million.
The bill has been long opposed by Republicans in the Legislature who have argued that state government should not have a hand in helping undocumented immigrants attend college. They said as much after the bill passed in the Senate.
“While millions of New Yorkers struggle with crushing student debt, I can only imagine their disbelief when they find out that their hard-earned tax dollars will be going toward the higher education costs for individuals knowingly breaking federal law,” said Sen. Robert Ortt, R-Niagara.
The bill's sponsors have rebuffed that argument, pointing to the total size of the entire state budget—more than $160 billion—compared to the expected cost of the program, which is estimated to be about $27 million. Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, likened the bill to the state's persistent opposition to the federal government's immigration policies.
“While the administration in Washington is committed to putting up walls, the New York State Assembly is committed to breaking them down,” Heastie said before the bill passed the Assembly.
The legislation passed largely among party lines in the Legislature, with support mostly from Democrats. Those lawmakers also see the Dream Act as a precursor to more immigration-related legislation to come this year.
Consider a bill that would allow undocumented immigrants to obtain state drivers licenses, sponsored by Sen. Luis Sepulveda, D-Bronx. Sepulveda was also the sponsor of the Dream Act.
The legislation would allow individuals in New York to apply for a driver license regardless of their citizenship, and would also prevent the personal information of those residents from being shared with federal law enforcement officers.
Assemblywoman Carmen De La Rosa, D-Manhattan, said she expects to see the Legislature tackle more bills related to immigration this year. She supports Sepulveda's bill on driver licenses.
“This is not just a box we are checking off on our agenda,” De La Rosa said. “Today is simply one step in that direction for justice for immigrants in New York state.”
A bill that would ban federal immigration officers from entering state courts without a warrant to make a civil arrest, which could result in that individual's deportation, is also on the table, and it has a good chance of becoming law this year.
The bill was first introduced by Assemblywoman Michaelle Solages, D-Nassau, in the final weeks of last year's legislative session. It had little to no chance of passing then, because Republicans who controlled the Senate opposed the measure.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo had issued an executive order earlier last year barring federal immigration officers from making a civil arrest in any state facility without a warrant. Solages said she wants to codify those protections into state law and extend them to the state's courts, since a future governor could have a different position.
“We need to put it in statute,” Solages said. “We need to make sure that, no matter where you are in New York state, that the local courts abide by the rules.”
This year, the bill has a powerful ally in the Senate. Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, is sponsoring the bill in the chamber. He chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, which typically reviews legislation that will impact the state court system. The bill, which Hoylman only signed onto this week, has been referred to the Senate Codes Committee.
Solages said she's optimistic about the bill's future, given the additional time they have this year to push for the proposal and the new composition of the Senate.
“We want to make sure we protect the judicial system for all New Yorkers, regardless of their immigration status,” Solages said. “We're confident this year that we can get it done. Last year, we had a late start, plus we had the challenge of the Republican Senate.”
The proposal also was included in the governor's executive budget proposal unveiled earlier this month, which means that it could ultimately end up in negotiations centered around the state's spending plan. That budget, which is due at the end of March, is typically used by lawmakers as a catchall for legislation important to the governor and legislative leaders.
When asked about the bill, Heastie said he hadn't discussed it with the members of his conference to develop a unified position but that they plan to talk about it at some point.
“I want people to be very clear, the Democratic Assembly stands with immigrants,” Heastie said.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250