NY Lawmakers Violated Stipulation in Creating Prosecutorial Watchdog, DAs Group Says
"Our next step is to amend our original lawsuit and seek an injunction, once again preventing this unconstitutional commission from being created," Albany County District Attorney David Soares said.
January 23, 2019 at 03:35 PM
6 minute read
New York State lawmakers. in passing a bill to enact a watchdog commission for complaints of misconduct against the state's prosecutors, may have violated a stipulation agreed on in a lawsuit filed by the state district attorneys' association, those involved in the litigation said Wednesday.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, is now planning to move for a preliminary injunction to block public officials from acting to establish the commission.
The stipulation, agreed to last month, required state lawmakers to provide regular updates on the status of the legislation to DAASNY. But, according to Albany County District Attorney David Soares, president of DAASNY, the group never received notice when lawmakers were laying the groundwork to introduce and pass the bill, which was approved last Tuesday.
Lawmakers were also required under the stipulation to inform DAASNY when the bill was assigned to a committee, passed that committee, and was approved by the state Legislature. They were not informed, according to Soares, who said they will now be advancing their litigation, starting with the motion for an injunction.
“Unfortunately, the Legislature did not follow the spirit of the stipulation that was signed, which would have given DAASNY visibility into the bill before the votes,” Soares said. “In the mutual interest of justice they did not consult DAASNY or our attorneys. Our next step is to amend our original lawsuit and seek an injunction, once again preventing this unconstitutional commission from being created.”
DAASNY is represented pro bono by Jim Walden and Jacob Gardener from Walden, Macht & Haran in Manhattan.
Press officers for Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester, did not comment on the alleged violation.
The alleged breach will not have any immediate effect on the litigation. There is no recourse DAASNY can take beyond filing for an injunction and pushing forward with its lawsuit against the state, according to the stipulation. It could, however, give attorneys for DAASNY some ammo in court to show the Legislature's contempt for their position on the issue.
DAASNY sued Cuomo and the leaders of each party in the state Legislature in October over the constitutionality of the so-called Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct. The panel would be tasked with reviewing complaints of misconduct that involve the state's prosecutors and imposing or recommending sanctions against them when wrongdoing is found.
The lawsuit, in its current form, is against a bill passed by the Legislature in June and signed into law by Cuomo in August that created the commission. The legislation was met with constitutional concerns, both from the state's prosecutors and the state attorney general's office. Cuomo, in an effort to correct those concerns while still approving the legislation, signed the bill with a promise from lawmakers to amend it in January.
DAASNY agreed in the stipulation, approved by the court in December, to hold off on their lawsuit until lawmakers passed that amendment. In exchange, Cuomo and lawmakers agreed to give DAASNY at least a month and a half of notice before they appointed anyone to the commission. They also agreed to keep them updated on the status of the proposed changes.
The amendment, which was outlined broadly by Cuomo and state lawmakers in August, was intended to correct the constitutional concerns identified by DAASNY and the attorney general's office. But the amended law still doesn't align with the state constitution, Soares said, which will be reflected in their forthcoming amended complaint.
“It is unfortunate that the Legislature could not find a constitutionally permissible framework for this bill, which protects the independence of all DAs statewide and places our hardworking assistant DAs on equal footing with other attorneys in the state,” Soares said. “We laid out in fine detail all of the constitutional defects inherent in the bill and yet both houses again voted on an unconstitutional piece of legislation, which failed to correct even obvious infirmities identified by the Attorney General's Office.”
The amendment corrected some—but not all—of the constitutional flaws alleged by DAASNY in its lawsuit from October. It largely gave more power over the commission to Cuomo by giving him more appointments to the panel than any other individual. The law previously gave the Legislature more appointments than Cuomo.
The Attorney General's Office said that could be interpreted as unconstitutional since it would give that branch of government power over the state's district attorneys, who are considered part of the executive branch.
The amendment also tasked the state's four Appellate Divisions of the State Supreme Court with reviewing the commission's decisions if requested by a sanctioned prosecutor. The original law left that up to the Court of Appeals, which was also determined to be unconstitutional by the Attorney General's Office.
Many other constitutional flaws DAASNY claimed in their lawsuit remain in the law. The organization has argued that the law failed to set any standards for the commission to initiate an investigation and determine an appropriate sanction against a prosecutor, for example, which could be seen as a violation of due process, according to their complaint.
Cuomo and state lawmakers hired outside counsel last year to defend against the lawsuit after the state Attorney General's Office chose not to get involved in the litigation.
Cuomo retained Jim McGuire and Daniel Sullivan, partners at Holwell Shuster & Goldberg in Manhattan; Stewart-Cousins is represented by Benjamin Hill, a solo practitioner in Albany; and Heastie is represented by Andrew Rossman, Kathleen Sullivan, and Alex Spiro, all partners at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan in Manhattan.
READ MORE:
NY Lawmakers Approve Constitutional Fix to Law Creating Prosecutorial Watchdog
NY Lawmakers Propose Changes to Bill Setting Up Prosecutorial Watchdog
Cuomo, Lawmakers Agree to Pause Prosecutorial Conduct Watchdog
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
- 2Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
- 3Long Hours and Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
- 4Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
- 5'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250