Women Lawyers Deploy Tactical Maneuvers to Handle Child Care
With women still carrying the bulk of child care responsibilities, lawyer-moms working long hours handle the kid-care challenge with creativity and precision.
January 28, 2019 at 12:05 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Dorit Ungar Black, a founding partner of Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, calls it the summer of hell. The babysitter was supposed to be waiting for Liam, 5, and Sivan, 3, when the bus brought them home from summer camp. But instead, the place was deserted. “That was not a pleasant call to get,” she said.
Another babysitter ignored her calls and texts, so Black and her lawyer-husband, Barry Black, who has his own firm, Nelson Madden Black, raced home on the train to Westchester to be sure the children wouldn't be returning to an empty house.
“We had three different babysitters, none of whom lasted very long,” she laments.
But shortly before school began, the family found a reliable nursing student to babysit, and the anxiety of summer soon faded. Still, despite the frantic ride home and the embarrassing phone call, Black knows she is fortunate to be able to afford quality child care.
“I have not really cut down on work since becoming a mom five years ago,” she says. “What gives is I have very little me time, and that requires a lot of acceptance.”
Jeanene Jobst, senior counsel at Turner Broadcasting in Atlanta, was at work when a phone call sent her into a panic.
The babysitter who was scheduled to pick up her young daughter at her school bus stop was canceling at the last minute. With just 10 minutes until dropoff, it was physically impossible for Jobst to get there in time to ensure her 7-year-old, Madison, wasn't left on the side of the road—alone.
“I frantically texted and called neighbors. Thankfully, one works from home, so she was able to get my daughter and keep her until I could get home,” Jobst said. “Needless to say, the babysitter was fired, but it still doesn't help you in the situation.”
These stories would strike fear in the heart of any lawyer-mom, who—despite the day's plans for a high-stakes deposition or a pressing client hearing—always keeps mental space and energy to know where her children are and ensure they're cared for. However terrifying these examples are, the truth is that each and every mom-attorney has her own story of a time that child care fell through and left her needing to drop work and fix the problem.
Child care is such a common topic among members of MothersEsquire, a national group of lawyer-moms, that the organization chose to partner with the trade association Women Owned Law to produce a webinar on the topic, called, “BossMoms: How to Manage When You Manage It All.”
“Everybody is just craving the information,” explained Laura Landenwich, a founder of Adams Landenwich Walton in Louisville, Kentucky, who was one of the webinar presenters.
Mothers spend twice as much time on routine child care than fathers, according to Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan, a psychology professor at Ohio State University, who researches dual-earning households with shared parenting duties. The birth of a baby increases a mother's workload by 21 hours per week, but only 12.5 hours for dads, Schoppe-Sullivan found. Moreover, Schoppe-Sullivan notes that, according to others' research, fathers' involvement in parenting is focused on direct child care, meaning that most mothers are in charge of managing how their children are cared for when moms and dads are away.
At the same time, working moms face bias and stigma, dubbed the “motherhood penalty,” said Liz Morris, a professor and deputy director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco.
“Whenever a mother does something that highlights her motherhood role, that may trigger bias,” said Morris, who researches workplace gender equity issues. “If a mother is unexpectedly unable to come into work because child care falls through, or her baby is sick, that's going to trigger that bias.”
Lawyer-mom Cori Rosen waited to have children because she was afraid no one would take her seriously after she did. But she thinks becoming a mother has had the opposite effect. ”I think having kids has made me less nervous as a person, which has helped my career,” she says.
She credits her firm, Rosenberg & Estis, and its female managing member, Luise Barrack, for being a positive role model, because she raised two children who are now grown. “You think she pulled it off. I can pull it off,” she says.
Rosen's first child, Logan, now 3, came three weeks early when she was in the midst of preparing for a meeting on a big case with the U.S. Attorney's Office. Two days after she got out of the hospital, she went to the meeting as her husband waited frantically for her return. But now that the new parent jitters have gone away, he shares equally in the responsibility of taking care of Logan and 2-month-old Seaver.
“Why would I marry anyone who wouldn't do that?” she says. “I don't know why one of us should be more responsible for things than the other.”
And for lawyers, who don't have the typical 9-to-5 hours, finding child care that fits with the work schedule can be particularly difficult.
A live-in nanny is a great solution for lawyer-moms who earn top dollar in big law, but other moms must find solutions better suited to their budgets. Day care is a common option, but it can be tricky finding a facility open before 8 a.m. and after 5 p.m., noted MehaffyWeber associate Elizabeth Perez of San Antonio, who sends her 2-year-old daughter to a private preschool.
Support from family and friends helps tremendously. For example, Blank Rome associate Sarah Wilson of Cincinnati, Ohio, relies on her mother to watch her child—three days per week at Wilson's home, and two days at grandma's. As kids grow up and attend public school, lawyer-moms use after-school programs to provide care until they're off work. But when school is closed for holidays or the summer that's a new problem: Babysitters or summer camps are among the top answers.
Even with a solid child care strategy, on any given day something can go wrong and the best-laid plans can fall through. That's when tactical thinking kicks in, said Houston solo Samantha Martinez, the co-presenter of the BossMoms webinar. As a litigator, she's very familiar with the challenge.
“I deal with such tremendous, big problems on a daily basis,” she explained. “For me, when I hit stumbling blocks with my kids—whether child care or otherwise—I have a better perspective because I have to get over these things all the time.”
Landenwich, the co-presenter of the BossMoms webinar presented last month said it's easy for a lawyer-mom to feel burnout, if she starts feeling failure on every end—like she's not raising her children, managing her household or juggling her practice the way that she wants.
To help alleviate feeling overwhelmed, Landenwich came up with a solution she dubbed “Take Tuesdays,” when she stays home from work and handles all the chores at home, knocking out a to-do list just like a job. She makes up her work time on other days. In addition, she and her husband have a meeting every Sunday to chart out each others' work schedules and their kids' school and extracurricular events on a calendar, planning out who will pick up, drop off and chauffeur the kids each day.
Martinez, meanwhile, uses shortcuts to manage it all. Meal delivery services that prep ingredients for home cooking are a big help, and when her kids were small she would purchase toys in bulk so she always had a gift to pull out for birthday parties they attended. She delegates housework—her husband and kids do chores for themselves.
Despite the best research, planning and organization, there will always be times that motherhood clashes with work. While some firms and corporate employers are sensitive and understanding, other attorneys face serious consequences—not always from their employers. This happened to Elizabeth Steen, who took off work to care for her sick daughter.
“I could not go to a meeting. I had to cancel appointments, lose a client, and the members of a networking group I am in sent me an email questioning my commitment,” said Steen, lead attorney at Washington Business Advocates in Seattle.
Morris, the workplace gender equity scholar, said that, to spur change, employers in the legal profession need to train all employees about unconscious bias against mothers.
But there is good news: Research has shown that millennial men have different views of parenthood. They want to be involved in their kids' lives and be equal partners with their wives—which includes child care. This trend could eventually alleviate the motherhood penalty for lawyer-moms.
“Employers will begin to be less likely to see women of childbearing age as a disproportionate burden on the workplace and company and begin to realize that most people have someone or more than one person in their lives they are responsible for caring for,” Morris explained. “It's not just a woman's issue—it's a human issue.”
Angela Morris is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
7 minute readNot All Secrets Are Trade Secrets: SDNY Examines the Limits of NDA Protection
13 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250