Report: Securities Class Action Filings Hit Records as Settlement Values Swell
White Plains-based NERA Economic Consulting's annual report also found that aggregate investor losses totaled $939 billion in 2018 -- a sign of a “systematic shift toward larger filings.”
January 29, 2019 at 04:58 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Filings of securities class actions hit record levels in 2018, with stronger cases on the docket and an increase in settlement values, according to NERA Economic Consulting's annual report, released on Tuesday.
There were 441 new filings of securities class actions in 2018, a slight increase from the year before, but the highest level since the 2000 dot-com crash, according to NERA's “Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2018 Full-Year Review.” Aggregate investor losses, defined by NERA as “the aggregate amount that investors lost from buying the defendant's stock,” totaled $939 billion, nearly four times the average during the past five years. That trend, the report concluded, could indicate a “systematic shift toward larger filings.”
“The primary takeaway is the size of new securities class actions, specifically, the size of what I refer to as the 'standard' case — the Rule 10b-5, section 11 and 12 cases. Those are much larger this year,” said Stefan Boettrich, co-author of the report and senior consultant at NERA Consulting, based in White Plains, New York. Part of that is due to massive shareholder cases against General Electric Co., whose shares dropped 56 percent in 2018. But not all can be attributed to GE. “Clearly, we're seeing a big jump in investor loss size in individual cases,” he said.
Many of the bigger cases made traditional securities allegations, like accounting or missed earnings. The technology sector saw a 70 percent uptick from 2017 in filings involving allegations missed earnings guidance.
The report also looked at settlements, whose values rose in 2018. The number of settlements was small when compared to dismissals, and the average deal value of $69 million, up from $25 million in 2017, was primarily due to the $3 billion agreement with Brazilian energy company Petrobras. But the median value of settlements in 2018, when excluding settlements of more than $1 billion, was $13 million — twice that of 2017.
“It very well be a consequence of stronger cases making their way through the system,” Boettrich said. He predicted large settlements would continue in 2019 given that pending cases now have a total investor loss of $1.4 trillion, or $1.1 trillion when excluding the GE cases.
As in 2017, merger objections made up about half the filings, spurred by the Delaware Court of Chancery's 2016 decision in In re Trulia Stockholder Litigation. That could mean merger objection filings have plateaued, Boettrich said.
The report also found that attorney fees were $790 million. That's 70 percent higher than in 2017 but, Boettrich noted, not that substantial when compared against the total value of all settlements last year, which was $5.3 billion.
Here are some more details of the 2018 report:
- Regulatory filings, such as those involving price fixing or emissions defeat devices, dropped 75 percent against foreign companies. Filings against Chinese firms rose, but those against European companies dropped.
- Excluding filings over merger objections, 64 percent of the new cases were in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Ninth Circuit, home to several technology firms. Merger objection filings were “increasingly active” in the Third Circuit, which includes Delaware.
- Settlements worth less than $10 million dropped from 61 percent in 2017 to 45 percent in 2018, with 44 percent of deals falling between $10 million and $49.9 million.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Increases Scrutiny of Fund Administrators, Financial Attorneys Say Amid Settlements
4 minute readSchwab Gasparini Partner Wins Series of Accidental Retirement Disability Cases in Albany Appeals Court
Soon-to-Be-Public Stock Trading Platform Hires Securities Industry Veteran as GC
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250