Protesters Suing Trump Over Scuffle With Security Detail Want to Put Him on Stand
A lawsuit against President Donald Trump filed by protesters who allege that the then-candidate's security detail roughed them up in 2015 during a campaign speech is moving forward to trial in a Bronx state court and the plaintiffs want the president to testify.
January 30, 2019 at 07:09 PM
4 minute read
A lawsuit against President Donald Trump filed by protesters who allege that the then-candidate's security detail roughed them up in 2015 during a campaign speech is moving forward to trial in a Bronx state court and the plaintiffs want the president to testify.
But a lawyer for Trump argues that the president is not obligated to comply with the plaintiffs' subpoena and that the survival of their case may hang on a pending ruling from a state appeals court as to whether or not plaintiffs sue a sitting president in state court.
Attorneys for the protesters have moved for Bronx Supreme Court Justice Fernando Tapia to order Trump to testify in the case, which is scheduled to go to trial March 6.
“The law gives plaintiffs a right to the testimony of every defendant in the case,” said Roger Bernstein, a solo attorney representing the plaintiffs, in a written statement “By our motion today, we have asked the court to secure that right and affirm the principle that no one, including defendant Trump, is above the law.”
Benjamin Dictor of Eisner & Dictor and Nathaniel Charny at Charny & Wheeler also represent the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs, a group of five Mexican activists, say they took to the streets in protest outside Trump Tower in September 2015 in response to Trump's statements during a June 16, 2015, campaign announcement that Mexico is sending “rapists” and people bringing drugs and crime into the United States.
They allege that Keith Schiller, Trump's chief security officer, and some of Trump's bodyguards approached the group and that Schiller moved to grab one of their signs, causing a scuffle to break out.
In August, Tapia ruled to preserve the plaintiffs' vicarious liability claims against Trump and the Trump Organization for the actions of the security detail, as well as their assault and battery claims, but dismissed negligent hiring claims against Trump and the Trump Organization.
The defendants are appealing the ruling to the Appellate Division, First Department.
In a letter to the plaintiffs' attorneys dated Jan. 11, contained as an exhibit in the plaintiffs' motion for Tapia to order Trump to testify, Lawrence Rosen of LaRocca Hornik Rosen Greenberg & Blaha cited as reasoning for rejecting the subpoena a pending ruling from the First Department in another suit against Trump that could determine whether or not a sitting president can be sued in state court.
In that case, Summer Zervos, a former contestant on “The Apprentice” who says that Trump groped her and subjected her to unwanted kissing in 2007, is suing Trump for defamation in Manhattan Supreme Court for calling Zervos a liar during campaign speeches and on Twitter.
Trump's lawyers are appealing a ruling by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Schecter that the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution doesn't bar plaintiffs from suing the president in state courts.
Rosen, who did not respond to a request to comment on the plaintiffs' motion, said in the letter that if the First Department, which heard oral arguments in the Zervos case in October, finds for Trump, the Trump Tower protesters' claims would be dismissed or severed.
But even if the First Department affirms Schecter's ruling, Rosen said, the plaintiffs waived trial testimony from Trump because they did not renew a previous motion to compel Trump to sit for a deposition during the discovery phase, which he said is required to get a sitting president's testimony.
In court papers, Charny called the argument regarding pretrial discovery “frivolous” and said there is “no such thing” as waiving a party's right to call witnesses based on the scope of discovery.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appeals Court Grants J&J's Subpoena for Talc Expert as 'Clearly Relevant'
6 minute readDecision of the Day: Postal Service Shows Media Outlets' Requested Change of Address Data Is Protected
Decision of the Day: Canada-Based Defendant Had Virtual Office in New York, Giving Court Jurisdiction
NY Court Imposes Strict Construction on Additional Insureds in Construction
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250