NY AG James Leads Coalition in Interstate Smog Lawsuit Against US EPA
“Over two-thirds of New Yorkers regularly breathe unhealthy air due to smog pollution,” James said. “Yet, Trump's EPA is ignoring the Clean Air Act and refuses to require reductions in the pollution largely responsible for this serious public health risk."
January 31, 2019 at 05:18 PM
4 minute read
New York Attorney General Letitia James is leading a coalition of six states and New York City in a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for allegedly failing to regulate interstate smog pollution, her office announced on Thursday.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, challenged a rule created last year by the EPA that allows states whose smog travels into New York to take no further action to cut down on that pollution.
It has hinged on the so-called good neighbor provision of the Clean Air Act, which requires the EPA to intervene when regulations promulgated by a state are not sufficient to ensure that federal smog health standards can be met in other states where its pollution travels.
The agency determined in 2015 that the planned actions of 24 states would not sufficiently and collectively reduce pollution emissions enough for those standards to be met in New York. Many of those states were directly upwind of New York, including Illinois, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and others.
The EPA did not step in to create a plan for smog reduction that would benefit New York as the Clean Air Act prescribes, according to James. Instead, the agency promulgated a so-called close-out rule that said those states did not have to reduce their emissions any more than already planned to comply with the good neighbor provision of the law.
The two-page lawsuit filed by James on Thursday seeks to strike down the close-out rule as “unlawful, arbitrary and capricious,” according to documents. If the court sides with James, the rule would be vacated and the EPA would have to intervene to develop additional regulations to curb emissions in the states identified in 2015.
“Over two-thirds of New Yorkers regularly breathe unhealthy air due to smog pollution,” James said. “Yet, Trump's EPA is ignoring the Clean Air Act and refuses to require reductions in the pollution largely responsible for this serious public health risk. My office will stand firm for the quality of air in our state by forcing Trump's EPA to follow the law and to ensure New Yorkers' legal right to clean air.”
A spokeswoman for the EPA said the agency does not comment on pending litigation.
The lawsuit builds on previous litigation brought by James and the Connecticut Attorney General's Office that originally challenged the EPA's alleged failure to intervene in the planned emission reduction plans of the states identified in 2015. The decision, handed down in the Southern District of New York, ordered the EPA to address emission levels in states whose pollution traveled into New York.
It's the second lawsuit James has filed against the Trump administration since taking office at the beginning of January. The first sought to allow the commercial fishing industry to net a higher share of summer flounder since, according to the lawsuit, that type of fish has become more populous in New York waters in recent years. That litigation is ongoing.
The attorneys general of Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Jersey signed onto the lawsuit filed by James on Thursday. The New York City Law Department is also on the lawsuit.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250