Marijuana Legalization in NY Could Come Later Than Hoped, Lawmakers Say
What was previously thought to be an issue that could be resolved by the end of March, when the state budget is due, could now be dealt with later during this year's legislative session, which ends in June.
February 01, 2019 at 03:54 PM
4 minute read
The timeline for legalizing marijuana for recreational, adult use in New York became unclear this week after Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, and Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a fellow Democrat, differed on how quickly they could come to a resolution on the issue.
What was previously thought to be an issue that could be resolved by the end of March, when the state budget is due, could now be dealt with later during this year's legislative session, which ends in June.
Cuomo said during a radio interview on Friday that he still sees a path for an agreement on legalization over the next two months, but that he's open to dealing with the issue after the budget is done if it comes to that.
“Six weeks, in this business, it's a long period of time and I think we've tackled harder, but it does have to be done right and if it can't be done right, we'll do it afterwards,” Cuomo said.
His position was in response to comments made on Thursday by Heastie, who told reporters that lawmakers may not have enough time to deal with marijuana before the budget is due. There are a host of other issues, such as upgrading the mass transit system in New York City, that are also expected to be contentious in the coming months.
Heastie took to Twitter to explain his position after advocates for marijuana legalization expressed concern over pushing legalization further down the road.
“Being honest and saying six weeks may not be enough time to come up with regulations, deal with economic impact on communities and the criminal justice aspects, somehow gets reactions of outrage instead of understanding and acknowledgement of the commitment to get this done,” Heastie tweeted.
The delay would, in theory, not be a long one. Heastie and Cuomo have agreed that marijuana legalization should happen this year, especially with states around New York also considering the change or already implementing it. Massachusetts has legalized the drug for recreational use and Pennsylvania and New Jersey are considering it this year.
There are a slew of differences between the proposals for marijuana legalization from Cuomo and the Legislature, many of which concern who would be allowed to sell the drug for recreational use and how the new law would benefit those previously convicted of low-level drug charges. Cuomo's proposal, for example, would allow medical marijuana companies to enter the recreational market. The Legislature's bill would not.
That's among the many details that still have to be worked out between Cuomo and lawmakers. Elizabeth Kase, a partner at Abrams Fensterman in Manhattan and co-chairwoman of the firm's medical marijuana law group, said the state is more likely to have a better program if it takes the time needed to consider all options.
“Based on what we've seen play out in other states and how local authorities here in New York, including townships and law enforcement, are already pushing back, I believe a reasoned and measured approach to legalization has a lot of merit,” Kase said. “The state needs to make sure its matrix is sound and that all the nuances are thought through before codifying a legalization framework. Otherwise, I could foresee a chaotic and uncertain implementation playing out.”
Among those nuances are changes to the state's laws dealing with law enforcement and criminal records. Lawmakers and attorneys have already raised concerns over road safety after legalization, since there's currently no easy way for standard law enforcement officers to confirm when someone is intoxicated by the drug. The agreement is also expected to address the sealing of records for some low-level marijuana offenses.
The state budget is due by the end of March, after which lawmakers will have three more months to wrap up any unresolved issues before the legislative session is set to end on June 19.
READ MORE:
NY Lawmakers Fret How Legal Marijuana May Complicate Motor Vehicle Law
Cuomo Details Marijuana Legalization, Criminal Justice Reform in NY Budget Speech
NY Lawmakers Move Closer to Approving Criminal Justice Reform Legislation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250