New York Law School Still Faces Financial Challenges, Moody's Finds
The bond credit rating company has once again bestowed a negative financial outlook on the Manhattan school, citing its need to dip into reserve funds to cover operating expenses and soft enrollments. The school said its endowment and real estate holdings remain strong.
February 08, 2019 at 01:14 PM
3 minute read
A national uptick in law school applicants wasn't enough to prompt a key bond credit rating agency to reverse its negative outlook on New York Law School's finances.
Moody's Investors Service on Thursday affirmed the school's Baa3 bond rating, which is the lowest rating for investment grade bonds and indicates that Moody's believes the school's bonds represent a moderate risk to investors. The Moody's report assigned the law school a negative outlook, saying that the school's spending of its financial reserves to cover operating shortfalls is “well above” the industry standard of 5 percent. The school's bonds are valued at about $140 million.
“The rating also considers tuition pricing challenges and operating deficits that will continue for the foreseeable future, leading to a likely deterioration of spendable cash and investments,” reads the Moody's report. “Despite an increase in the number of applications for law schools nationally, net tuition revenue remains pressured, resulting in a weak average operating deficit of 26 percent over the last three years.”
Law school spokeswoman Elizabeth Thomas said in a written statement Friday that the Moody's rating reflects the schools “strong leadership team, focus on strategic planning, and recent successes amid a challenging environment for legal education.”
“The rating also recognizes the high value of the school's Tribeca campus and its large endowment,” she wrote.
Amid the bad news, Moody's also found some bright spots at New York Law School. The school owns prime real estate in New York's trendy Tribeca neighborhood—three buildings that were appraised at $253 million in 2015. A profit-sharing deal tied to the sale of condominiums on land that the law school once owned helped the law school improve its fiscal picture in 2018, Moody's noted. Moreover, strategic planning that reduced operating expenses and increased enrollment helped to reduce operating deficits. Still, covering the school's operating expenses will “require extraordinary endowment spending,” Moody's found.
The school enrolled the equivalent of 960 full-time students in 2018, and generated $48 million in revenue last year, according to Moody's.
The school took out bonds to fund the construction of its main building, which opened in 2009 and cost $190 million.
New York Law School's financial picture would improve with a growth in net tuition revenue and strategic initiatives that bring its operating expenses into equilibrium, Moody's noted. But if the school has to dip too far into its reserves or the market value of its real estate declines, then its bond rating could be downgraded, the report warns.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Issue of First Impression’: New York Judge Clears Coinbase Appeal Amid Crypto Regulatory Clash
4 minute readMeet the Long Island Judge Tapped to Be US Attorney for Eastern District of New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250