Treatment of Transgender People in Custody Must Improve
Quite frankly, it is difficult to overstate the extent to which transgender people are subjected to mockery, humiliation and violence at the hands of the police.
February 08, 2019 at 09:01 AM
5 minute read
Last month, the New York Civil Liberties Union and the national ACLU filed a lawsuit against the NYPD on behalf of Linda Dominguez, a transgender woman who was arrested by the NYPD and prosecuted by the Bronx District Attorney's office for “false personation” because she provided the NYPD with both her new legal name (pursuant to a legal name change) and her old name she was given at birth. While she was in their custody, police officers harassed and cruelly mocked Linda because she is transgender.
My office, The Bronx Defenders, represented Linda in the underlying criminal case. As the LGBTQ client specialist at The Bronx Defenders, I represent many of the hundreds of transgender clients who are arrested and prosecuted in the Bronx every year. What Linda experienced was, unfortunately, the norm for the NYPD, but what was uncommon about Linda was her willingness to move forward with a lawsuit to hold the police accountable.
Quite frankly, it is difficult to overstate the extent to which transgender people are subjected to mockery, humiliation and violence at the hands of the police. In the five years, I've worked as a defender, I have never met a transgender client who was not abused or harassed in some way by the NYPD during the process of their arrest.
There's Kimberly, who begged not to be placed in a holding cell with men after her arrest, and was only removed when she tried to hang herself. Or Diamond, who was so severely injured by officers during her arrest that she had to get stitches at the hospital before being brought before a judge. The officers assaulting Diamond called her derogatory names targeting her gender identity and sexual orientation. Even when transgender people have not been arrested, but go to the NYPD seeking help, what we hear from our clients is that they are routinely ignored, and their complaints dismissed.
This reality saddens but does not surprise me, not only because of my experience representing transgender clients (ours is the only public defender office in the country with an LGBTQ practice), but also because of my experience conducting training for police officers under a mandate to ensure that they respect transgender people who are in their custody.
Officer training was mandated in 2012 by amendments to the NYPD's patrol guide, a set of rules officers must abide by in doing their jobs. In sum, the protocols prohibit police officers from using disrespectful remarks regarding a person's gender identity, using incorrect names and pronouns, searching people for the purpose of determining their gender, and holding transgender people in cells inconsistent with their gender identity. The new guidance was hard-fought by the LGBTQ community and considered a big win at the time.
But as I soon learned, “training” meant trying to get the attention of two dozen or so police officers during a 20-minute roll call slot in which most were there for the pizza I offered. Those who weren't openly hostile just couldn't wrap their heads around the idea of treating a transgender woman as a woman — or even a human being. They used words such as a “fake woman with penis,” or “it,” and competed to see who was the most transphobic and macho. As a gender nonconforming person myself, I left the precinct shaken and demoralized.
That precinct was one of only six out of 77 to even hold a training, as the New York Inspector General reported in 2017. The report, cited in the ACLU/NYCLU lawsuit, criticized the lack of adequate training as well as a failure to track all LGBTQ-related complaints alleging bias, including violations of the revised patrol guide protocols. Little wonder, then, that no allegations of LGBTQ bias have been substantiated since the NYPD began reporting on this category in 2014.
There is no question that the NYPD has been flagrantly ignoring their own regulations, and it is way past time that something is done about it to hold them accountable. The lawsuit on behalf of Linda Dominguez is a first step. What else can be done?
The city's district attorneys should refuse to allow charges of “false personation,” which are prohibited under the 2012 protocols; in addition, they should scrutinize charges brought against transgender people. Transgender women of color, are especially vulnerable to entanglement in the criminal justice system, and district attorneys should consider that in their prosecution. Judges, for their part, should continue to ensure that transgender people are respected in the courtrooms.
Criminal defense attorneys, too, can be part of the solution, by becoming familiar with the patrol guide protocols in addition to other laws protecting the transgender community, such as New York City's Human Rights Law. They should explain to their transgender clients the remedies that are available when they have experienced abuse, harassment or discrimination by police officers, including filing CCRB complaints, filing complaints with the NYC Commission on Human Rights, and filing civil rights lawsuits.
Ultimately, though, it will take the hard work of culture change within the police department to make this behavior unacceptable. The NYPD can march in Pride Parades, and they can set up programs through the Gay Officers Action League (GOAL), but they will not gain the trust of the transgender community until they take it on themselves to end the violent transphobia that runs rampant within the department.
Deborah Lolai is staff attorney and LGBTQ client specialist for The Bronx Defenders.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute readLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250