Historic Bronx Church Wins Bankruptcy Settlement Ahead of Second Circuit Argument
First Union Baptist Church was fighting to keep an adverse bankruptcy decision from resulting in its deed reverting to control of its creditor.
February 11, 2019 at 12:10 PM
4 minute read
A historic African-American church in the Bronx secured a new lease on life as part of a settlement deal announced Monday that short-circuited upcoming litigation scheduled in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The First Union Baptist Church has faced legal battles that stretched from state court to the federal appellate level over the past nine years, after foreclosure proceedings were commenced in state Supreme Court in the Bronx after the church missed a mortgage payment in 2010.
The settlement announced Monday forestalls an appeal proceeding in the Second Circuit over the undoing of a Chapter 11 settlement in federal bankruptcy court at the district level by former judge Katherine Forrest.
Attorneys for the church highlighted the details of the settlement itself: the ability for the church to continue to operate in its current location, along with a development deal to create 45 units of housing.
“This is a perfect example of collaborating to build sustainable communities while at the same time protecting those vital institutions that maintained stability during the turmoil of economic and social unrest,” Susan Chase, staff attorney with the Community Development Project at The Legal Aid Society, said in a statement. “The people in our communities should not be put on the auction block in the name of economic development when property values rise.”
The crux of the legal crisis for the church came after a 2015 late court-ordered payment as part of a bankruptcy agreement. The holder of the mortgage, TD Capital, immediately executed an option to convert ownership of the church property in accordance with a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure provision of the agreement.
The church's co-counsel of the Legal Aid Society and pro bono efforts by Kasowitz Benson Torres led to a reopening of its bankruptcy case and, ultimately, after a trial, a favorable decision in that court found TD Capital's attempt to record the deed was unenforceable under New York State law, voiding the move.
However, the bankruptcy decision was unwound by Forrest. The ruling by the district court led to the appeal. The church argued that Forrest incorrectly reviewed the bankruptcy decision for questions of law and fact, rather than for clear effort.
“In doing so, the District Court improperly substituted its own findings of fact for those of the Bankruptcy Court and ignored well-settled New York law in determining that the transfer of the Deed was not a mortgage, and that the Deed-in-Lieu Provision was not an impermissible penalty,” the church argued on appeal.
A few weeks before scheduled oral arguments, the parties alerted the Second Circuit that settlement talks were under way.
“Kasowitz Benson Torres is extremely gratified to have had the opportunity to help save First Union Baptist Church in a win-win resolution that will return the Church to a sound financial footing and also provide housing to 45 low-income New York residents and their families,” said Kasowitz Benson Torres partner David Abrams, who led the firm's efforts on behalf of the church.
Private attorneys Gary Ravert and Laleh Hawa represented TD Capital on appeal. Neither immediately responded to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
4 minute readDistressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
Trending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 2'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 3Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 4As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
- 5Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250