Upstate NY's Female Judges Tell Stories of Mistaken Identity, Isolation
Being a female judge in upstate New York is still a rarity. There are 25 mostly rural upstate counties with no female judges in the state's employ and 10 with just one each.
February 13, 2019 at 02:58 PM
5 minute read
When Supreme Court Justice Bernadette Clark is in her car, residents will notice the judicial plates and say, “Hi judge.” The only problem is they're talking to her husband.
“From my perspective up here, it's the resistance to even thinking you can run for judge,” the Oneida County jurist said. “They would talk about my hair, my clothes, my makeup, the length of my skirt. I tried to change the conversation. Let's talk about my qualifications.”
Being a female judge in upstate New York is still a rarity. There are 25 mostly rural upstate counties with no female judges in the state's employ and 10 with just one each. That compares to the New York City metropolitan area where nearly 400 of the state's 507 female judges are concentrated, according to state statistics.
Related Story: Cases of Mistaken Identity: Female Judge in NY Told 'I'd Rather Wait for the Judge'
By those standards, Oneida County, with three female judges on the state payroll, is considered progressive. Still, Clark said, she is often treated with disrespect.
“I have one lawyer still to this day who still calls me 'ma'am' although I have asked him to address me as 'judge' or 'your honor,'” she said. “The lawyers in court would say things and act certain ways in my courtroom that they would never think to pull in some of the other judges' courtrooms.”
The same stories were repeated again and again by New York's upstate female judges.
Lawyers agree to appear in front of a female judge but when a male judge later schedules a matter at the same time, they seek an adjournment from her rather than him. They arrive late in a female judge's courtroom or leave early to attend to a proceeding in a male judge's courtroom. They address a female judge in a tone that they'd never use with the male judge down the hall.
“I do often feel that I get the short end of the stick in terms of getting attorneys if they're double-booked and I do feel attorneys very often will double-book more because they feel they can get away with it,” said Family Court Judge Julia Brouillette, who is also in Oneida County.
But, she acknowledges, the discrimination has become less egregious with the passage of time. She points to an experience she had as a young attorney in Texas when appearing in a pants suit in front of an older male judge.
He had her approach the bench. “I'm a judge because I want to see a little leg,” he confided. “And I said 'duly noted.'” The next time she appeared before that judge, she recalls with just a little bit of embarrassment that she wore her shortest skirt, a low-cut blouse and a push-up bra. And, lo and behold, the judge sided with her on all her objections that day.
Syracuse City Court Judge Kate Rosenthal remembers that when she first started as a lawyer the male bar association was having an event and wanted to know whether the female bar association would prepare the food.
Such thinking might be a relic of the past but stereotypes still exist. Sometimes, though, Rosenthal is able to see the humor in the stories she tells.
“The defendant kept calling me 'miss' instead of 'your honor' or 'judge,' which is better than some of the names we get called,” she recalls. “His lawyer leaned over and said, 'It's judge.' And so he said, 'Miss Judge.'”
But she notes that the treatment of female judges and attorneys has improved since her early days.
“I had one Supreme Court judge say, 'Any time I see you it's nothing but trouble. Why don't you stay home in the kitchen?' And I said, 'Judge, have you ever seen me in your kitchen? Believe me, you don't want to see me in your kitchen.'”
Oswego County Family Court Judge Allison Nelson, who is the only female judge on that court, was assigned to represent a client as a young lawyer. “I was the only person there with a suit and briefcase,” she says. “But this judge in front of my client asked me for identification.”
Onondaga Supreme Court Justice Deborah Karalunas said being a female judge can make her feel isolated because she's left out of golf outings and other social events. Lawyers take liberties with her too, she complains.
“I feel that lawyers are sometimes attempting to flirt. Don't tell me 'my hair looks nice today.' Is it horrific? No. It just tells me that we are treated differently,” she says.
But, upon reflection, she doesn't want anyone to feel sorry for her.
“I have met so many, many wonderful lawyers and judges throughout the state, and forged so many, many cherished friendships,” she writes. “And I know that the discrimination I've sustained pales in comparison to that endured by many others in and out of this profession. So I leave you with this: I am truly blessed.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250