Pepper Hamilton Grows in Rochester, Taking Over LeClairRyan's Office Space
Pepper Hamilton managing partner Thomas Cole said his firm was not targeting Rochester as a geographic region. It was the LeClairRyan group's substantive IP practice, and its presence in the health sciences space, that made the hire strategic, he said.
February 19, 2019 at 10:42 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
The group of legal professionals joining Pepper Hamilton from LeClairRyan has swelled to 24, including a dozen total lawyers, growing the firm's new Rochester, New York, office.
The law firm confirmed last month that five LeClairRyan intellectual property lawyers would be making the move to Pepper Hamilton to launch the new office. They will be joined by seven more lawyers—six associates and one senior attorney—as well as four patent agents, two technical specialists and several paralegals.
The partners leading the group are Michael Goldman, Gunnar Leinberg and Andrew Zappia. According to Goldman, Pepper Hamilton will be taking over LeClairRyan's office space in Rochester, but he declined to say whether LeClairRyan was pulling out of the city entirely.
LeClairRyan president Elizabeth Acee, who was named to that position earlier this month, could not be reached for comment.
Goldman said his group began talking with Pepper Hamilton more than half a year ago, in the summer. “We've been talking steadily and things moved forward since then,” he said.
Pepper Hamilton managing partner Thomas Cole said his firm was not targeting Rochester as a geographic region. It was the LeClairRyan group's substantive IP practice, and its presence in the health sciences space, that made the hire strategic, he said.
“Mike and his team have been working together well over a decade. … They are very specialized and have complementary skills to the work we do,” Cole said. “If we were to go and try to build the capabilities that Mike's team has on an individual or one-off, two-off basis, it would have taken a very long time to do that.”
The new group will be housed in Pepper Hamilton's health sciences department, Cole said, and will work closely with others throughout the firm, including the IP department. Goldman said his group is strongly situated in health sciences in its patent work, both in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology.
He declined to name clients or characterize the size of the group's book of business. According to court records, clients in recent years have included GlaxoSmithKline, Arcadia Biosciences, Albany Molecular Research and Interactive One LLC.
Goldman said his group engaged in discussions with other law firms that saw their location in Rochester as a limitation, but Pepper Hamilton did not, which he characterized as “forward-thinking.”
Still, Cole said the firm is not seeking to add more lawyers in Rochester in the near future.
LeClairRyan saw 42 partners leave in 2018, and lost at least 20 more within the first month of 2019, according to data from ALM Intelligence.
In a recent interview with ALM about the Rochester departures, Acee said, “We're building law firm 2.0 and we'll be stronger,” referring to the firm's newest venture with alternative legal services provider UnitedLex Corp. In June, LeClairRyan partnered with UnitedLex to launch ULX Partners LLC, which outsources nonlegal operations for law firms for a minority equity stake in the venture. As a result, more than 300 LeClairRyan employees joined the new venture.
Asked about the differences between his former firm and Pepper Hamilton, Goldman said Pepper Hamilton is “a very established firm” with mature practices.
“LeClairRyan was a relatively young firm and has a lot more things going on there as far as issues,” Goldman said. But asked whether recent departures from and changes at LeClairRyan pushed his group to leave, Goldman said they were more motivated by the opportunity at Pepper Hamilton.
“The leadership at LeClairRyan has been nothing but professional and cooperative and has handled the transition in a very professional way,” Cole added.
Pepper Hamilton has also experienced changes over the past few years, Cole acknowledged. From 2015 to 2017, the firm's head count slimmed from nearly 500 lawyers to 450, and its gross revenue declined from $388.5 million to $341.8 million.
Cole said the firm has been more focused on revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner in recent years. It also created an industry-focused health sciences department in 2017, pulling together over 100 attorneys across practices.
“It is a slightly different firm than it was in 2014 and 2015,” Cole said.
Pepper Hamilton has not publicly released its 2018 results, but Cole said it grew revenue per lawyer and made important additions in California and New York throughout the year.
“We think the firm is matched well now [in terms of] head count and demand. And we're optimistic about 2019 and beyond,” he said.
|Read More
As 5-Lawyer IP Group Bolts for Pepper Hamilton, Shrinking LeClairRyan Plans 'Law Firm 2.0'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 2From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Rollercoaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 3Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 4Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 5Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250