Milbank, 'Not a Wall Street Firm Anymore,' Takes New Name
The renaming to simply "Milbank" coincides with a move from downtown to new offices at 55 Hudson Yards.
February 21, 2019 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, one of New York's oldest and most elite law firms, is now simply Milbank LLP.
The name change became legally effective Tuesday, on the same day the firm moved from downtown to its new office at 55 Hudson Yards. The firm had been downtown since its founding about 150 years ago. Milbank's shortened name is visible throughout its new offices.
“We are not a Wall Street firm,” said Scott Edelman, the firm's chairman, in an interview Thursday. “We are so much more than that.”
While many have referred to the firm as simply Milbank, the change in its legal name makes it official and marks another step, along with the Hudson Yards move, in Milbank's evolution from its downtown roots.
The new name refers only to founding partner Albert G. Milbank and drops three partners off the firm's letterhead: Harrison Tweed, Morris Hadley and John J. McCloy, who had perhaps one of the most prominent careers among New York lawyers.
While all the former name partners served on prominent boards and positions beyond the law firm, McCloy was among the most visible in New York legal circles, serving as a “lawyer, diplomat and adviser to seven presidents,” according to an archived history from the firm's website.
In 1952, according to the firm's chronology, after another stint in public service, McCloy became chairman of the financial institution that would under his leadership become The Chase Manhattan Bank. He rejoined Milbank in 1961 as of counsel, but was soon pressed back into public service by President John F. Kennedy to act as special assistant on disarmament, and by President Lyndon B. Johnson, who appointed him to the Warren Commission, which investigated Kennedy's assassination. When he returned as a general partner, the firm name became Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy.
While the firm is proud of its history and the partners' contributions, Edelman said, “it's been so long that they've been associated with the firm,” and there's “no connection with the lawyers here today and those names.”
Milbank for many years was thought of as a Wall Street firm focusing on banks, Edelman said, “and the words 'white-shoe' were associated with that.”
“That's not at all what the firm is focused on today,” he said, adding that the firm's business with banks accounts for a minority of its revenue. “I don't think of Milbank as a Wall Street firm anymore.”
“We're not trying to walk away from doing that work,” but Milbank also represents many other types of clients, he said.
The firm's new brand is a more accurate and contemporary reflection of what Milbank has become and its success, he said, adding the rebrand is a “tangible symbol” of Milbank now.
“We're quite diverse,” he said, noting the firm has work across Latin America, Asia and Europe. He said the firm has thriving transactional, litigation and restructuring departments, represents companies, hedge funds and private equity funds, and handles work in new industries, such as satellite technology.
Two Milbank partners who helped the firm rebrand, Christopher Gaspar and Paul Denaro, said the firm's partners voted unanimously on the name change several weeks ago. But the rebranding effort stretched over months.
Denaro said the firm has been referred to over the years as Milbank, Milbank Tweed, its full legal name or just MTHC. “The whole point is to get everyone back to a common denominator,” he said, “so that we could have a consistent message about who we are as a firm.”
With the firm's new brand, the partners wanted to “be reflective of our modern firm but also not to lose sight of the 153-year heritage,” Gaspar said.
Milbank is far from alone in rebranding and shortening its name lately. The moves come amid a wider trend in the legal industry toward more compact names and tighter brand identities. Boston-based Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo pared down to Mintz. Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott formally changed its name to Bartlit Beck.
Milbank may be the first elite New York firm in recent memory to change its name, however. Several others in New York have remained committed to their longer names, and to the ampersands that bind them.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250