Double Jeopardy Worries Loom Over NY State Charges Against Manafort
Reports on Friday suggest Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance sees a way around state double jeopardy rules that could imperil new criminal charges against Paul Manafort, even as lawmakers and former AG aides continue to raise concerns.
February 22, 2019 at 04:37 PM
7 minute read
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.'s office was prepared to bring state criminal charges against former Trump presidential campaign manager Paul Manafort, according to media reports that surfaced Friday. But any case brought by state prosecutors under New York law would have to clear a big hurdle—the prohibition on double jeopardy.
Manafort is scheduled to be sentenced in two separate federal cases next month. He was found guilty on eight financial fraud related counts by a federal jury in Virginia last August. He subsequently pleaded guilty to separate charges in Washington, D.C., in September.
The effort being prepared by Vance's office, reports said, is framed as making sure Manafort will be held accountable for his crimes, even if he should be pardoned by President Donald Trump.
The ability to bring New York state charges against Manafort isn't as easy as simply convincing a grand jury. The attorney general's office claimed last year in a pitch to state lawmakers that, unless the state's double jeopardy law was changed, state prosecutors would be blocked from doing exactly what Vance's office is reportedly headed toward.
State Sen. Todd Kaminsky, D-Nassau, sponsors legislation to close the so-called double jeopardy loophole. He said any case brought by Vance's office against Manafort will likely be challenged right off the bat over the state's laws and that his bill would make such an argument moot.
“If this bill or something like it would be law, we would have clarity and these situations in the future would not arise,” Kaminsky said. “I have no doubt that whatever the Manhattan DA's office is going to bring is going to face a serious double-jeopardy challenge.”
Attorney General Letitia James has stated her support for the efforts made by her predecessors. She campaigned on the issue during last year's race to become the state's top lawyer and even lobbied on its behalf when she traveled to Albany earlier this month.
“We're in the midst of discussions with the Assembly, and we hope to be announcing something very soon,” James said during an interview before she met with Cuomo and lawmakers last week.
No such announcement has been made as of yet, but Kaminsky said on Friday that they're making progress on bringing the bill to the floor for a vote.
“We're all working through language that the Assembly is hoping to see, that would make the bill a little more narrow but acceptable,” Kaminsky said.
Begun initially by former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and continued by his successor, Barbara Underwood, the AG's office used pardons by Trump to illustrate what the office claims is Trump's use of the pardon power to “thwart the cause of justice, rather than advance it.”
“We can't afford to wait to see who will be next,” Underwood warned in May. “Lawmakers must act now to close New York's double jeopardy loophole and ensure that anyone who evades federal justice by virtue of a politically expedient pardon can be held accountable if they violate New York law.”
Kaminsky echoed that warning during an interview on Friday.
“There are future 'Manaforts' out there and every day we are not passing this bill, we get one step closer to people being able to use a double jeopardy defense if a federal case is brought against them first,” Kaminsky said.
According to a letter from the AG's office in April 2018, state law offers strong protections against prosecutions by state officials for identical acts or offenses already pursued by another jurisdiction. If a defendant pleads guilty to federal crimes or proceeds to a federal jury trial, then state prosecution is barred based on the same acts or criminal transactions.
While there are exceptions to the statutory language in the event of nullification of criminal proceedings by the courts, there appears to be none on the books in the case of the President of the United States doing so.
According to Bloomberg News, which first reported the Manhattan DA's plans, Vance's team has been investigating Manafort since 2017. The local prosecutors are fully aware of the restrictions posed by the double jeopardy law and are actively seeking to get around them, according to the reports. For example, Vance could proceed with state charges of falsifying books and records related to Manafort's manipulation of bank records for which special counsel Robert Mueller III brought federal bank fraud charges.
A spokesman for the Manhattan DA's office declined to comment on the media reports.
Some observers familiar with the debates within the AG's office aren't so sure Vance will be able to clear that hurdle, despite the reported confidence. Eric Soufer, a former top aide to both Schneiderman and Underwood, took to Twitter to air his concerns. According to him, the office “drilled down on this issue with some of the best criminal prosecutors in the business.”
“The consensus? There's almost no way to bring state charges against someone at state level after they've been tried at fed level for analogous crimes,” Soufer wrote.
Kaminsky said it's possible that state prosecutors could bring charges against Manafort that weren't brought up during last year's wide-ranging criminal trial in the Eastern District of Virginia. Vance's office could focus on charges brought in relation to certain lenders that were not alleged in the federal case, for example, or they may be able to bring a tax fraud case against Manafort, Kaminsky said.
But those charges are minimal compared to what could be brought if the state's double jeopardy laws were changed, he argued.
“There are narrow ways they can think about carving it up,” Kaminsky said. “But we're really asking prosecutors to basically try to crawl through the 3-foot-high tunnel in order to get through the past, so to speak, and I think it's unfortunate and this is assuming it survives a challenge.”
The legislation has stalled among Democrats who want to see it written more narrowly to avoid situations where it could backfire. The intent would be to allow state prosecutors to bring charges in major cases, like Manafort's, not smaller cases where a future president pardons someone of a low-level crime.
Kaminsky said, if anything, the news that Vance's office has prepared a case is all the more reason for lawmakers to coalesce around his bill.
“Despite the Manhattan DA's ingenuity and figuring out a way through, I nevertheless still think this greatly highlights the double jeopardy loophole bill we're trying to get through the Legislature,” Kaminsky said.
A spokeswoman for the AG's office did not respond to a request for comment.
Related:
NY AG James Meets With Cuomo, Lawmakers in Albany on Legislative Priorities
Effort to Close Double Jeopardy 'Loophole' in NY Revived in New Session
Aiming to Trump Pardons, Schneiderman Seeks Closure of State Double Jeopardy 'Loophole'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute read'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250