NY Proposal Would Reduce Misdemeanor Sentence by 1 Day to Prevent Deportation
The proposal from Sen. Jessica Ramos would reduce the maximum prison sentence for a misdemeanor in New York from one year to 364 days.
February 22, 2019 at 03:08 PM
6 minute read
Reducing the maximum prison sentence for misdemeanors in New York by one day could prevent undocumented immigrants from facing deportation when convicted of those crimes, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Democrats who control the the state Legislature have claimed.
That's been the impetus for new legislation, proposed both in Cuomo's executive budget proposal last month, and as a standalone bill sponsored by State Sen. Jessica Ramos, D-Queens.
The bill took a step forward this week after Assemblyman Marcos Crespo, D-Bronx, formally signed on to sponsor it in the Assembly. That makes its chances of passing outside the state budget more likely as lawmakers prepare for the final leg of negotiations on the spending plan, which is due at the end of March.
Crespo has sponsored the bill in previous years, during which it passed the Democrat-led Assembly. Republicans who controlled the Senate blocked it from coming up for a vote during that time, but that's likely to change this year after Democrats took control of the chamber.
Ramos said she wants to see the legislation approved and sent to Cuomo for his signature immediately, but that it very well could end up in the budget.
“I would love to do it as soon as possible. I also think March will be here in the blink of an eye,” Ramos said.
Federal law triggers a deportation proceeding when an undocumented immigrant is convicted of a crime that carries a maximum sentence of at least a year. That doesn't mean the individual has to receive a yearlong sentence for an immigration judge to be notified. An immigrant could be sentenced to six months in prison, for example, but if the charge on which they were convicted carries a maximum sentence of at least a year, they could be subject to deportation.
The proposal from Ramos would reduce the maximum prison sentence for a misdemeanor in New York from one year to 364 days. That one-day difference would prevent federal immigration authorities from pursuing that immigrant for deportation based on their sentence, Ramos said.
“The idea is to reduce the sentencing for nonviolent misdemeanors from 365 days to 364 days because that one day of a difference will ensure that our families can stay together, will ensure our undocumented population is able to stay contributing to our economy,” Ramos said.
Her legislation is nearly identical to a proposal Cuomo included in his executive budget last month for the same purpose, but in some ways it goes further. It would allow a one-year sentence imposed before the bill is enacted to be set aside if the defendant shows it would “result in severe collateral consequences,” according to the legislation.
The proposal would impact more individuals than just immigrants who are charged with a misdemeanor in New York. Defendants charged with nonviolent felonies can often have their charges reduced to the misdemeanor level through a plea deal with prosecutors. That can be a huge benefit for some defendants who will face a lighter maximum sentence.
But an immigrant in the same situation may be faced with deportation through such a deal if their reduced charge still carries a maximum sentence of one year. The bill would strike that as a possibility for immigrants who may not be aware of the potential consequences, Ramos said.
“We know the criminal justice system largely relies on a plea bargain, and unfortunately, many undocumented New Yorkers that might not understand their rights, often agree to things without really having gone through the process,” Ramos said.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, the group that represents the state's prosecutors, doesn't have a position on the legislation. Albany County District Attorney David Soares, a Democrat who currently serves as president of the organization, said he personally supports the idea.
“I'm very much in favor of that. We do a lot of expungement and sealing work in this office because of the immigration issues,” Soares said. “That's just a no-brainer for us.”
The legislation has also gained the support of advocacy groups pushing for criminal justice reform and immigrant protections at the state level, including the Fortune Society. The organization has advocated for criminal justice reform for decades but has more recently gotten involved in supporting ways the system could be changed to benefit immigrants.
“What we learned is that if the maximum risk was 364 days, which makes no difference in terms of criminal justice consequence, it could make a life-changing difference in terms of immigration consequence,” said JoAnne Page, the president and CEO of Fortune.
The proposal is the latest in a series of bills that Democrats have introduced this year to benefit immigrants faced with legal or criminal issues, particularly when it comes to the state's courts.
State Sen. Brian Kavanagh, D-Manhattan, reintroduced a bill this year similar to Ramos' proposal that would require immigrants to be informed that a plea deal may still result in their deportation, for example. That way, an immigrant may decide to go to trial in hopes of being exonerated rather than agree to a deal that may still result in them being deported.
“The idea is that there are many instances where people might choose or might even be advised by their lawyers to plead to a lesser charge for the usual reasons people would do that,” Kavanagh said. “It's very important for people to understand the very significant implication in terms of their ability to remain in the country.”
Another proposal, sponsored by State Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, and Assemblywoman Michaelle Solages, D-Nassau, would block agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from making an arrest in a state courthouse without a warrant signed by a federal judge.
Neither bill has made it to the floor for a vote in the Legislature, but their approval is more likely this year after Democrats took control of the state Senate for the first time in more than eight years. Democrats have had a firm majority in the Assembly for decades.
If the proposals are not included in the state budget, lawmakers could pass them at any point until they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250