SEC Judgment Ends Case of Ex-Foley & Lardner Partner Who Profited From Firm Secrets
The U.S. Securities and Exchange commission announced Friday that it secured a final judgment in Manhattan federal court against Walter "Chet" Little,
February 26, 2019 at 08:49 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Almost two years since his May 2017 arrest, the government has meted out what's likely to be its last dose of punishment for former Big Law partner Walter “Chet” Little, who's already serving prison time for using confidential information on Foley & Lardner's clients to gain an investing edge.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange commission announced Friday that it secured a final judgment in Manhattan federal court against Little, 45, a former real estate and banking lawyer in Tampa, Florida, for Foley & Lardner and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings. Little and a neighbor of his, Andrew Berke, previously admitted to taking part in an insider trading scheme that collectively earned them more than $1 million in illicit profits.
The civil judgment, which Little consented to, bans him from violating parts of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Act and the Securities Act of 1933, as well as specific SEC rules. The SEC also sought to force Little to disgorge just shy of $453,000 to make up for what he individually earned through insider trading. But the agency noted in a statement that the disgorgement obligation was satisfied by Little's sentence in his parallel criminal case, which required him to forfeit the same amount.
Little pleaded guilty in the criminal case in November 2017. Federal prosecutors and the SEC had alleged that toward the end of Little's time at Foley & Lardner—where he spent more than a decade as an associate and partner—he used the firm's internal computer network to access confidential information related to business developments among the firm's clients.
Little didn't personally represent any of the clients, which included Whiting Petroleum Corp. and Harley-Davidson Inc., but he used the confidential information he accessed to make stock and option trades based on upcoming announcements at the companies. Beyond making his own trades, he tipped off his neighbor Berke, who also traded on the nonpublic information, the federal government said.
The pair used coded language in the scheme, prosecutors said. This text message from Little to Berke was allegedly a prod to buy Whiting stock, for example: “I think Publix is running a sale on Wheaties. You should pick up some tomorrow.”
After pleading guilty, Little was sentenced about a year ago to 27 months in prison and three years of supervised release. He's currently serving out his criminal sentence at a minimum security prison camp in Montgomery, Alabama, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, with a scheduled release date of Dec. 13.
Berke also pled guilty in a parallel criminal case and was sentenced to time served and ordered to forfeit $555,269.
Beyond its impact on Little's life and legal career, his case presented a cautionary tale for law firms tapping into the lateral partner hiring market, in part because he switched firms less than a year before his arrest. Little left Foley & Lardner in the summer of 2016 and joined Bradley Arant in July of that year.
After news of Little's arrest in May 2017, Foley & Lardner explained that, almost a year earlier, it had opened an internal investigation into potentially improper trading activity by one of its partners. As a result of the probe, Foley & Lardner sacked Little for violating firm policies and reported its findings to authorities. There was no indication that Foley & Lardner communicated with Bradley Arant about the reasons for Little's departure.
Bradley Arant then brought Little on board in July 2016. Although the firm said it had conducted extensive due diligence before hiring Little, it had no knowledge of any ongoing investigation until the former partner was picked up by authorities. Bradley Arant fired Little the day he was arrested.
|Read More
Ex-Foley & Lardner Partner Hit With 27-Month Sentence in Insider Trading Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Secret Litigation: How Will AI Innovations Likely Be Litigated?
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250