A legal malpractice lawsuit lodged by a personal injury defendant against its legal counsel, alleging that the firm failed to tell it about evidence that would have triggered it timely notifying its excess insurance carrier, cannot be won on summary judgment, a state appeals court has decided.

Issues of fact related to possible malpractice remain, and therefore summary judgment is not in order, an Appellate Division, First Department, panel ruled Tuesday.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]