NY Lawmakers Delay Criminal Justice Reform While Differences Remain
Conversations on whether to completely end cash bail in New York remain a major sticking point among lawmakers, but a proposal to reform criminal discovery may also be tweaked beyond the current version in the coming weeks.
February 27, 2019 at 05:51 PM
6 minute read
The state's laws on cash bail, criminal discovery and the right to a speedy trial will go at least another week without reform by the Democrat-controlled state Legislature as lawmakers remain at an impasse on how to resolve their differences on those issues.
Conversations on whether to completely end cash bail in New York remain a major sticking point among lawmakers, but a proposal to reform criminal discovery may also be tweaked beyond the current version in the coming weeks.
Assemblyman Joseph Lentol, D-Brooklyn, said Democrats in his chamber met to discuss criminal justice reform this week, but haven't come to an agreement on on any of the major issues.
“We're kind of at an impasse right now on bail,” said Lentol, who chairs the codes committee in the Assembly and is involved in negotiations on criminal justice reform.
Lentol said there's been a lot of discussion within the conference on consolidating the two major bail reform proposals put forth by Democrats last year. State Sen. Michael Gianaris, D-Queens, has a bill that would end monetary bail altogether, while a proposal from Assemblywoman Latrice Walker, D-Brooklyn, would have kept it for more serious crimes.
Walker said earlier this month she was planning to reintroduce a bill on bail reform, though the new version is still being worked out. Gianaris' legislation to end cash bail was reintroduced in January, but his conference hasn't brought it to the floor for a vote. Lentol said not all Democrats in the Senate may be willing to support the legislation without an agreement with the Assembly.
“I don't think their bill had much success in their conference either,” Lentol said. “They have a position that their conference might not support, and we amended our bill to match theirs and now we might have lost some support.”
Gianaris was not immediately available to comment on the progress of discussions on bail reform among Democrats in the Senate.
But while negotiations on bail continue, a two-way agreement on criminal discovery reform may be amended before it becomes part of the final package. Lentol said opposition to the bill from the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York has caused some to take a step back on the proposal, which would significantly shorten the amount of time by which prosecutors must exchange material with the defense that they intend to use at trial.
“I think bail is the most difficult of the three and discovery has seemed to fall into its own difficulty because the district attorneys think they can stop it by pleading with some of the interest groups,” Lentol said.
State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, a Democrat from the Bronx who chairs the Codes Committee in the upper chamber, said they're still in the midst of discussions on a final bill to reform criminal discovery. The same is true, Bailey said, for legislation intended to shorten the amount of time defendants wait before their day in court, often referred to as speedy trial reform.
“We're trying to make sure we've understood the concerns of every member and that they're being considered,” Bailey said. “It's something that we have to make sure we're deliberative about, and get it right instead of just getting it done.”
A similar position is held by Albany County District Attorney David Soares, a Democrat who currently serves as the head of DAASNY. Soares said the state's prosecutors have been individually reaching out to their elected officials to voice their concerns on the current criminal justice reform proposals and that their perspective should be considered before lawmakers take up a final package of bills.
“I don't want the demagoguery to get in the way of progressing on this front for reform. I just wish we could get to a table, let's air out our concerns and let's pass reform this year,” Soares said. “But we have to do it being mindful of the concerns of victims, witnesses, and people who are indigent and unable to receive the level of services in the criminal justice system that the wealthy do receive.”
He said he's hoping to meet with leadership in the Legislature in the coming weeks to discuss how the current proposals could be changed to address their concerns. Soares said there's been a misconception that prosecutors are opposed to reform out-right, but that that's not true.
“We are not saying no to reform and we have tried to make that clear,” Soares said.
Criminal justice advocates, who held the largest rally on those issues this year at the state capitol Wednesday, said the opposite. They blame prosecutors for the delay from lawmakers on enacting reforms to the state's laws on bail, criminal discovery and speedy trial.
Tina Luongo, the Legal Aid Society's criminal practice chief, criticized efforts by DAASNY to halt the current proposals, particularly on discovery reform.
“It is time we stop the delay. It is time we call for accountability and transparency,” Luongo said. “It has been 40 years since we've been trying to get discovery reform and every single year they fight it.”
The rally was held against the backdrop of several public defender groups traveling to Albany for their annual lobby day Wednesday. Attorneys met with several public officials to make their case for various issues related to public defense, including criminal discovery reform.
Among those lawyers was Andrew Kossover, a defense attorney from New Paltz who serves as legislative chair of the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. He was part of a group that met privately with Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie.
Kossover declined to discuss the conversation but said public defenders had been making the rounds with elected officials throughout the day to make their case on relevant issues, including discovery.
“It's an informative day,” Kossover said.
READ MORE:
Bail Reform Remains Sticking Point in NY Criminal Justice Reform Debate
NY Criminal Justice Reform Bills in Flux, Assembly Speaker Says
Criminal Justice Reforms Would Come With Fiscal Hit, DAs Group Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024
- 2January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 3'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 4Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 5Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250