Neomi Rao's DC Circuit Nomination Clears Senate Panel
Two other federal appeals nominees—Michael Park and Joseph Bianco, both picked for the Second Circuit—were up for a vote Thursday but the committee held them over until next week. Park is a name attorney at the litigation boutique Consovoy McCarthy Park. Bianco is a federal trial judge in the Eastern District of New York.
March 01, 2019 at 10:54 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The nomination of Neomi Rao for a seat on the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit advanced Thursday to the full U.S. Senate, following several days of new scrutiny of her stance on abortion.
Rao has been largely viewed as a lock for a seat on the D.C. Circuit, succeeding now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh on a court teeming with disputes that fall squarely in her wheelhouse: administrative and regulatory issues. Rao now leads the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a central office in the Trump administration's deregulatory push.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12-10 along party lines to advance Rao's nomination to the Senate floor.
Rao's nomination hit a snag days ago when one member of the committee, Sen. Josh Hawley, the Missouri Republican and a former clerk to Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., suggested he could not vote for Rao if she were pro-choice.
Hawley, writing at the conservative site The Federalist, said on Wednesday: “As someone who believes deeply in the right to life and the equal dignity of every person, including the unborn, confirming judges who will resist the siren song of judicial lawmaking is especially important.” Hawley declared: “I'm not going to let other people, and certainly not the Washington establishment, do my thinking for me.”
But Hawley said Thursday he was persuaded to advance Rao's nomination after meeting with her again. Rao, according to Hawley, said she believed the text of the Constitution is fixed and its meaning must follow that text, and she said the concept of dignity does not justify departing from the Constitution's text. The concept of individual dignity was central to Justice Anthony Kennedy's decisions upholding the rights to an abortion and same-sex marriage.
The Washington Post reported this week that Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, was also questioning Rao's nomination. Republicans hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate.
Conservatives in Washington have defended Rao's credentials and qualifications, saying she is a strong fit on the D.C. Circuit. Rao is a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas, and was the founder of the Center for the Study of the Administrative State at the Antonin Scalia Law School.
Rao's nomination earlier came under fire for a column she wrote in college on campus sexual assault and date rape. In a 1994 article titled “Shades of Gray,” Rao, then a Yale undergraduate, said: “A man who rapes a drunk girl should be prosecuted. At the same time, a good way to avoid a potential date rape is to stay reasonably sober.”
Rao apologized in a Feb. 11 letter she sent to Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, and Dianne Feinstein, D-California, saying her column was “insensitive.” Graham is chairman of the Judiciary Committee and Feinstein is the ranking Democrat.
“Sexual assault in all forms, including date rape, is abhorrent,” Rao wrote. “Responsibility for the rape is with the rapist. I believed that as a college student and continue to believe that today.”
Thursday's vote comes after the confirmation this week of Perkins Coie partner Eric Miller for a Seattle-based seat on the Ninth Circuit. Miller was confirmed despite the fact his two home state senators in Washington had not consented to his nomination.
“This is wrong. It is a dangerous road for the Senate to go down,” Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, said in remarks on the Senate floor. “Confirming this Ninth Circuit court nominee without the consent or true input of both home state senators, and after a sham hearing, would be a dangerous first for this Senate.”
Two other federal appeals nominees—Michael Park and Joseph Bianco, both picked for the Second Circuit—were up for a vote Thursday but the committee held them over until next week. Park is a name attorney at the litigation boutique Consovoy McCarthy Park, and is a leading attorney in the suit challenging Harvard's undergraduate admissions practices. Bianco is a federal trial judge in the Eastern District of New York.
Trump has confirmed more federal appeals court judges—31 as of this week—than at any point in a president's first two years in office.
Former SCOTUS Clerks Dominate the Ranks of Trump's Judicial Nominees
|Marcia Coyle contributed reporting from Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250