O'Melveny Posts Record Income, Profit Growth in 2018
"The firm hit on all cylinders in the last year," said New York-based chair Bradley Butwin.
March 01, 2019 at 07:08 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
O'Melveny & Myers saw record increases in profits per equity partner (PEP) and net income in 2018, with both figures growing at over 12 percent.
Gross revenue increased by 8.5 percent, climbing just past the $800 million mark, up from $738 million the previous year. The firm's revenue per lawyer hit $1.19 million, up 6.4 percent, while a 12.6 percent increase to PEP brought that figure to $2.262 million.
Net income grew at a similar rate, hitting $377.8 million.
“The firm hit on all cylinders in the last year,” said New York-based chair Bradley Butwin. He noted that O'Melveny's share value, a crucial internal metric that determines how individual partners are compensated, climbed a record 17 percent and has increased 46 percent over the last four years.
“The financial performance was primarily driven by increased demand, not by rate increases or cost controls,” Butwin said.
Head count at the 15-office firm was stable over the course of 2018, with the total number of attorneys growing by 2 percent to 673. The firm, which says it is structured as a single-tier partnership, reported 178 partners, two fewer than the previous year.
O'Melveny's growth in 2018 was broad based, across a wide range of departments and industries. Butwin said it was a strong year for the firm's staple practices—trials, health care and life sciences, investigations, antitrust, cybersecurity and data security, and restructuring—that have delivered for a number of years in a row.
In the antitrust arena, partner Daniel Petrocelli delivered a major trial victory for AT&T in the U.S. Department of Justice's challenge to its historic $85.4 billion merger with Time Warner. The bankruptcy practice guided the government of Puerto Rico through its restructuring over $70 billion in public sector debt and $50 billion in pension obligations, and it's advising California on the bankruptcy of PG&E, the state's largest utility. The firm also has a key role in Johnson's & Johnson's defense against investigations and litigation stemming from the opioid crisis.
Other practices have seen more recent demand increases. The wider economy has seen a boom in fundraising for infrastructure, and in 2018, O'Melveny's clients secured leading roles in a $10 billion plan to redevelop and modernize New York's JFK Airport.
The firm's entertainment, sports and media practice is also surging. O'Melveny represented David Tepper in his NFL record $2.275 billion purchase of the Carolina Panthers. It's also representing Twentieth Century Fox in ongoing litigation against Netflix over the latter's poaching of Fox executives.
The #MeToo era has also kept O'Melveny lawyers busy. In 2018, the firm won a court victory for Harvard in a widely covered Title IX case involving allegations of campus sexual assault and advised the University of Southern California's Board of Directors on an investigation of alleged sexual harassment.
“We've always had a big practice representing colleges and universities, but, until the past two years, that didn't involve as many harassment claims,” Butwin said. This work has also fostered collaboration between the firm's white-collar and investigations practice and its labor and employment practice.
Butwin wouldn't point to a practice area that lagged in 2018, but he did recognize clients' growing sensitivity to prices.
“It's not a particular practice of ours that is under pressure, it's recognizing the imperative to partner with clients and give them what they need,” he said. “We tend to be very bold in fixed-fee areas, not just for cases but for entire portfolios of work. We get rewarded for being efficient, and the client gets certainty.”
Butwin added that this allows the firms to build dedicated teams that understand the clients' business because of the repeat work, associates gain a better read of these companies' operations and burnish their own chances for promotion, and his own projections and budgeting increase in certainty.
With regard to traditional billing, O'Melveny increased rates in 2018, at a clip Butwin said was “relatively modest compared to other firms.”
The firm added talent in a number of areas in the last year, including the addition of a three-member private equity team in Century City from Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, veteran Supreme Court advocate and Stanford Law professor Jeffrey Fisher in Silicon Valley, and Hong Kong-based dealmaker Li Han.
Butwin also teased a “huge” upcoming hire on the horizon of a public sector veteran with experience in government investigations and cybersecurity: “We are fortunate to attract those who are at top of the game in terms of government service.”
Nearly 80 percent of the firm's nine newly partners promoted for 2019 are either women, people of color, or LGBT lawyers. “It's not just about promoting people, it's getting them to the point that they're able to cross the line,” Butwin said.
While O'Melveny has been the subject of a string of reports putting the firm in merger talks with Magic Circle firm Allen & Overy over the last year, Butwin asserted that firm was content with its footprint and size and had no expansion plans in the offing.
The firm's inventory going into 2019 was up 18 percent, and it carries no debt.
“As you can see from our financials and our client-related results, we're very focused on serving our clients and our firm, and we're looking forward to a strong year in 2019,” Butwin said.
|Read More
'People get cold feet' – The Latest on A&O and O'Melveny's Merger Talks
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250