Many remember that home maven Martha Stewart was convicted after trial for her involvement in an insider trading scandal in the mid-2000s. What most do not know or remember is that she was not actually convicted on insider trading charges—she was convicted of making false statements to government investigators and obstruction of justice. That case illustrated, once again, that one of the most powerful weapons in the federal prosecutor’s arsenal is the ability to charge witnesses in government investigations with making false statements to investigators and/or obstruction of justice. These charges carry significant penalties, and are always available if a witness knowingly and corruptly lies, covers up, or obstructs, regardless of whether there is, or ever will be, sufficient evidence to charge anyone with the underlying crime being investigated.

Today, more than 10 years later, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections provides the most recent and visible proof that the false statements and obstruction of justice weapon has been well maintained and remains fully loaded. Counsel for witnesses in government investigations would be wise to place greater emphasis on its significance when advising clients.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]