Former Assistant at Ex-Inmate's Law Firm Files Workplace Harassment Lawsuit
Mariella Tumminello alleges that Neal Wiesner of the Wiesner Law Firm retaliated against her when she came forward to complain about continued sexual advances by Randall Hirsch, an associate with the firm and also a named defendant in the suit.
March 06, 2019 at 06:14 PM
4 minute read
In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan state court, a legal assistant who worked for a firm founded by a previously incarcerated man whose 17-year quest to practice law in New York attracted headlines alleges that he failed to protect her from sexual harassment by a male associate.
Mariella Tumminello alleges that Neal Wiesner of the Wiesner Law Firm, who spent six years in prison in the 1980s for attempted murder and taking part in an illegal drug distribution scheme and who obtained his J.D. from the City University of New York School of Law in 1994, retaliated against her when she came forward to complain about continued sexual advances by Randall Hirsch, an associate with the firm and also a named defendant in the suit.
Specifically, Tumminello says that Wiesner forced her to work on a Thanksgiving holiday and threatened her with termination for complaining about sexual advances by Hirsch, who Tumminello alleges subjected her to a “dramatic” incident in which he used her phone with his pants pulled down so that she could see his genitalia through his underwear.
Wiesner answered a call from the Law Journal on Wednesday afternoon.
“I'm sorry, I'll have my attorney call you,” he said after a reporter identified himself, hanging up before taking any questions or identifying his attorney. Hirsch did not respond to a request for comment.
According to court papers, Tumminello, who is bringing claims under both the New York State and New York City human rights laws, resigned from the firm in November 2017. She is represented by Kelly O'Connell, a Miami-based attorney with the Derek Smith Law Group.
Wiesner lived a troubled life in the years before he went to prison, according to court papers and a 2012 Law Journal article chronicling his struggle to get admitted to practice in New York.
He began using drugs at age 12, dropped out of school at 16 and, in the early 1980s, began running fraudulent “sleep clinics” as fronts to sell Quaaludes that proved to be financially successful.
But things soon began to fall apart for Wiesner as federal authorities began to close in on him, a panel for the Appellate Division, First Department wrote in its 2012 order to allow Wiesner to practice in New York.
In a July 1983 incident, the panel said, he held his estranged girlfriend in her apartment at gunpoint and, as she tried to escape through a second-story window, he fired several shots at her but didn't hit her.
In 1985, he pleaded guilty in a state court on Staten Island to second-degree attempted murder, first-degree murder and other charges and was given a 12 1/2 to 25-year prison sentence. Later, he pleaded guilty to drug possession and conspiracy charges in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the Quaaludes scheme.
But in 1989, U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie of the Eastern District of New York granted Wiesner's habeas corpus petition on the grounds that he had been denied his right to represent himself in the Staten Island case and was instead given assigned counsel, and he was released in 1990.
Wiesner was admitted to practice in state and federal courts in New Jersey in 2005 and, in the years to follow, was eventually admitted to practice in New York's four federal district courts. However, he was denied entry into the New York bar nine times based on his past crimes before the First Department ruled, by a split decision, to grant him admission, citing the passage of time since his offenses and his clean disciplinary record in other jurisdictions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readWalmart Accused of Misrepresenting 'Cheese' Ingredients in Great Value's Macaroni & Cheese
3 minute readDecision of the Day: Attorney in Social Security Case Awarded Fees, But Must Pay Client Refund Under Equal Access to Justice Act
Decision of the Day: Former IDF Soldier Cannot Remain Anonymous in Workplace Discrimination Suit, Court Finds
Trending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250