MTA 'On Notice' of Need for Disability Act Compliance in Wake of Loss in Lawsuit
U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos issued a summary judgment that the transit authority should have included ADA-mandated accessibility plans during the renovation to a Bronx subway station.
March 06, 2019 at 06:05 PM
3 minute read
The Metropolitan Transit Authority has been “put on notice” to include accessibility features such as elevators whenever it looks to rehabilitate one of the city's subway stations, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York said Wednesday.
Berman's comments come the day after U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos granted partial summary judgment in favor of the disability advocates and their federal intervenors in the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office.
The suit was brought by the Disability Right Advocates on behalf of Bronx Independent Living Services and other plaintiffs over the renovations made by the MTA to the Middletown Road subway station in the Bronx between 2013 and 2014. Despite the full-scale replacement of staircases, platforms, and lighting, the authority did not install an elevator.
The plaintiffs brought suit in 2016 over the lack of an elevator as part of the renovations, arguing that the MTA was obligated to have made the installation under the American with Disabilities Act. The U.S. government joined the suit as an intervenor in March 2018.
In his opinion, Ramos agreed with the plaintiffs that the MTA was obligated under the act to make the accessibility improvements based on the scope and design of the usability of the renovations.
In a statement, Berman called Ramos' decision “the end of the MTA treating people with disabilities as second-class citizens.”
“The MTA is now on notice that whenever it renovates a subway station throughout its system so as to affect the station's usability, the MTA is obligated to install an elevator, regardless of the cost, unless it is technically infeasible,” the Manhattan U.S. attorney said. “Individuals with disabilities have the same rights to use the New York City subway system as every other person.”
In a separate statement, Disability Rights Advocates Managing Director Michelle Caiola, who was counsel to the plaintiffs, said Ramos' decision highlights concerns over the overall inaccessibility of the city's subway system.
“If MTA had been complying with the ADA over the past twenty-five years by installing elevators when it performs station renovations, we would be closer to full accessibility today,” Caiola said. “Clearly, MTA must change its practices related to accessibility as soon as possible.”
MTA Chief External Affairs Officer Max Young said “The MTA is steadfastly committed to improving access throughout the subway, with a hard and fast goal of making 50 additional stations accessible over five years. We're not wavering from that commitment. ”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250