A former pharmaceuticals company officer’s legal malpractice suit against Lowenstein Sandler, claiming the firm failed to give him key advice about potential tax consequences tied to exercising nonqualified company stock options, must be dismissed because of his contention’s “speculative nature,” a state appeals court ruled Thursday.

The “theory of proximate cause [that the lack of tax advice led to the former senior vice president losing millions of dollars] is belied by the record and relies on gross speculation,” an Appellate Division, First Department panel wrote in its decision.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]