Manafort Indicted by Manhattan DA for Mortgage Fraud
The indictment's announcement comes mere moments after Manafort was sentenced to a substantial sentence in Washington, D.C., federal court.
March 13, 2019 at 12:54 PM
3 minute read
Paul Manafort arrives at federal court in Washington, D.C., for his arraignment and bail hearing June 15, 2018. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort has been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury on 16 charges, including mortgage fraud, filing false business documents and related conspiracies, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced Wednesday.
The state indictment came just moments after Manafort was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia to more than seven years in prison on federal charges.
“No one is beyond the law in New York,” Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance said in a statement, calling the allegations against Manafort “criminal violations which strike at the heart of New York's sovereign interests, including the integrity of our residential mortgage market.”
According to Vance, the investigation commenced in March 2017. Reports swirled in late February that the Manhattan DA's Office was preparing to bring charges, at least in part as a way to make sure Manafort faces justice in the event President Donald Trump should issue a pardon.
The first five charges in the indictment are related to residential mortgage fraud connected to Manafort's property on Howard Street between December 2015 and August 2016. According to sparse details in the indictment, Manafort emailed an unnamed individual about an appraiser seeking to make an appointment to view a condo at the location.
“Remember, he believes you and [Individual #3] are living there,” Manafort is said to have written the person, referencing another unnamed individual.
A few weeks later, Manafort allegedly sent a letter by email to more unnamed individuals, with a document titled, “Use of Case Letter.docx.”
These same two individuals then communicated about Manafort not moving forward with a mortgage, with one party assuring the other there were no mortgagee clauses listed on a property. Less than a month later, Manafort signed a document titled “Uniform Residential Loan Application.”
According to reports, Manafort owned property at 29 Howard St. According to one of the federal indictments against him, Manafort bought the property in 2012 with funds funneled through shell companies as part of his lobbying work in Ukraine.
Manafort is also charged with nine counts of falsifying business records, each connected to a date, and covering a time period that extends from late January 2016 to January 2017, involving multiple lenders.
The state charges against Manafort also highlight legislative concerns coming out of Albany about the state's double jeopardy law and the prospect of pardons by Trump.
According to reports, some of the loans at issue in the state charges were the same used to bring charges against Manafort in the Eastern District of Virginia last year. If so, they are potentially subject to double jeopardy—a defense that will be all but certainly raised by Manafort's counsel going forward.
A spokesman for Manafort did not immediately provide comment.
Related:
Paul Manafort to Spend 7.5 Years in Prison
NY Lawmakers Expected to Pass Bill Closing Double Jeopardy Loophole
Double Jeopardy Worries Loom Over NY State Charges Against Manafort
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Investor Sues in New York to Block $175M Bitcoin Merger Investor Sues in New York to Block $175M Bitcoin Merger](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/f0/03/89d810cb48599bcaa9582fe55e0e/side-view-of-supreme-court-at-60-center-street-new-york-767x633.jpg)
![Family Law Practitioners Weigh In on Court System's New Joint Divorce Program Family Law Practitioners Weigh In on Court System's New Joint Divorce Program](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/2b/84/84aefb93401986b5e9ff17d6c82b/dilpreet-rai-767x633.jpg)
Family Law Practitioners Weigh In on Court System's New Joint Divorce Program
![Former NY City Hall Official Tied to Adams Corruption Probe to Plead Guilty Former NY City Hall Official Tied to Adams Corruption Probe to Plead Guilty](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/11/City-Hall-032114-767x633.jpg)
Former NY City Hall Official Tied to Adams Corruption Probe to Plead Guilty
![New Charges Expected in Sex Trafficking Case Against Broker Brothers New Charges Expected in Sex Trafficking Case Against Broker Brothers](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2021/06/SDNY-3-767x633.jpg)
New Charges Expected in Sex Trafficking Case Against Broker Brothers
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250