NY Lawmakers 'Extremely Close' to Criminal Justice Reform Deal, Senate Leader Says
“We are extremely close in the discovery, in speedy trial, a lot closer on bail," Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins said.
March 14, 2019 at 04:19 PM
6 minute read
Lawmakers are “extremely close” to striking a deal on legislation to change to the state's laws on cash bail, criminal discovery, and the right to a speedy trial and there's a good chance it could happen before the end of the month, Democrats said on Thursday.
That's contrary to the opinion of Gov. Andrew Cuomo and his advisers who have claimed in the past week that lawmakers have a “wide divide” on criminal justice reform that can't be reconciled without the pressure of including those changes in this year's state budget.
That spending plan is expected to be approved at the end of March, but Assemblyman Joseph Lentol, D-Brooklyn, said during a budget subcommittee meeting on Thursday that lawmakers could introduce and pass legislation reforming the state's criminal justice system separate from the budget before that deadline.
“In my view, the job of this subcommittee is to ensure that vital criminal and civil justice programs continue to operate,” Lentol said. “And enact vital changes to our criminal justice system, that I must say will probably occur in or outside of this subcommittee because the Senate and the Assembly are presently negotiating on a variety of different reform measures that we hope to agree on, hopefully even before the budget is passed.”
Cuomo wants criminal justice reform included in the budget to force state lawmakers to come to a deal on those issues before the spending plan is due at the end of March. He's suggested that without the pressure of budget negotiations, lawmakers won't come to an agreement on criminal justice reform until next year at the earliest.
Melissa DeRosa, a top adviser to Cuomo, on Wednesday, criticized the Legislature's inaction on the issue during the first two months of this year's legislative session, which started in January.
“We have a lack of faith in the Legislature coming to an agreement if we can't get there by April 1. There is a gall of differences between them on criminal justice,” DeRosa said. “We're now in March. Why is it that we haven't been able to get there yet? We believe if you can't get there by the end of the budget, it isn't going to happen.”
Hours later, Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester, refuted DeRosa's claim that Democrats were far away from a deal on criminal justice reform, saying lawmakers were “very close” to an agreement on ending cash bail, changing criminal discovery, and reforming the state's speedy trial laws. She repeated that view on Thursday during a radio interview.
“We are extremely close in the discovery, in speedy trial, a lot closer on bail. We understand that what we do is going to impact the lives of so many people incarcerated,” Stewart-Cousins said. “So, we want to get it right and we want to make sure it really reforms the criminal justice system in ways that will protect the innocent and make sure people who should be in jail are in jail.”
Lentol said if lawmakers come to an agreement before the budget is negotiated, they'll likely approve it outside the spending plan and send the bills to Cuomo for a signature. But coming to a deal in less than three weeks won't be easy, he said.
“If we can get it outside the budget, we'll do it. If we can get an agreement between the Senate and the Assembly, we'll do it,” Lentol said. “Bail reform is really a sticking point.”
Democrats in the Assembly and Senate have been working to negotiate a deal that would end cash bail, but lawmakers have been treading carefully around how to create a new system in a way that's fair to individuals accused of a crime and prosecutors who bring those charges.
Lawmakers are trying to decide how, and when, a defendant will be eligible to be held in jail before trial rather than be released on their own recognizance. Much of that conversation has to do with whether judges should have more, or less, discretion in those cases, and what factors should be considered when making that decision.
Assemblywoman Latrice Walker, D-Brooklyn, said on Thursday that if lawmakers do eliminate cash bail, they should be careful in legislating the determinants of pretrial detention and think about whether they could be discriminatory.
“It shouldn't be looking at a person with racial lenses, and making predetermined notions and decisions under a 'Minority Report'-style antics that states because you look like you might be engaged in criminality then you should be subjected to some other lens with respect to bail,” Walker said.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York has said its members support the idea of presumptive release for most low-level charges, but that others should be carved out to allow the possibility of pretrial detention.
The other two issues — changing criminal discovery and reforming the state's speedy trial laws — are all but settled, Lentol said. Those bills are intended to require prosecutors to provide material intended to be used at trial to the defense early on in a case and prompt both sides to move a criminal proceeding along efficiently.
“We haven't nailed it all down, but they're close enough to say that if we can get bail reform, we'll have a whole package,” Lentol said.
Lawmakers could pass each item individually, but several Democrats involved in negotiations have said they would prefer them approved as a package since they're all interconnected. If that package happens to be part of the state budget, lawmakers will have until the end of the month to reach a deal.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin London Offices
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-59
- 3The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 4Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 5Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250