Legal Aid Calls for Public Defender Pay Parity With Corporation Counsel Lawyers
“This inequality in pay deprives our staff of a sustainable living wage, impeding their ability to pursue careers as defenders,” said Janet Sabel, CEO and attorney-in-chief of the Legal Aid Society.
March 19, 2019 at 03:58 PM
5 minute read
Saying that lower pay is driving away experienced staff and sending a message from city officials that their work is less important, the Legal Aid Society on Tuesday called for city public defenders to be given pay parity with Corporation Counsel attorneys.
In a news release, Legal Aid, which was lobbying on behalf of all city defender organizations, called on the New York City Council to prioritize in its upcoming budget attorney-pay parity with Corporation Counsel, which is the city department staffed with lawyers who regularly defend the city and its agencies in civil cases. Corporation Counsel, also known as the Law Department, also represents the city in certain other matters.
“Our staff works relentlessly in courts and in communities on behalf of New York's most vulnerable,” said Janet Sabel, CEO and attorney-in-chief of the Legal Aid Society, in the statement.
“But for far too long,” she continued, “they have been working at a financial disadvantage compared to the city lawyers who appear opposite them.”
“This inequality in pay deprives our staff of a sustainable living wage, impeding their ability to pursue careers as defenders,” Sabel also said.
Corporation Counsel did not respond to a request for specific comment on Legal Aid's call for pay equality and its reasons for wanting the change.
But in email sent to the Law Journal late Tuesday afternoon, it said, “Our system of justice works best when all parties in litigation are represented by competent counsel. Fair compensation for those who represent indigent persons is a critical factor in recruiting and retaining effective lawyers.”
Mayor Bill de Blasio's office did not respond to a request for comment on Legal Aid's call for pay equality.
In the news release, Legal Aid pointed to an analysis it had done of Corporation Counsel's pay scale, stating that the analysis showed that Corporation Counsel can pay its attorneys with 10 years' experience an estimated annual salary between $95,000 and $108,000.
Legal Aid said that estimated salary range was “significantly higher than defenders' ability to pay their staff with the same experience level,” though the organization didn't elaborate on public defender pay scales.
Legal Aid did not respond Tuesday to a request by the Law Journal for 10 years' experience salary figures for city public defenders for a direct comparison.
The organization, which represents poor and sometimes destitute clients and is contracted by the city for its services, also noted in the release that it had reviewed retention rates for its criminal defense practice attorneys hired between 2007 and 2017.
We “discovered that, as the years of service and experience of staff increased, the rate of retention decreased, with the largest percentages of staff leaving between their fifth and 10th year of service,” Legal Aid said, adding that “by the 10th year, essentially half of that year's hiring class—nearly 48 percent—had departed for other employers.”
It added that “brief reviews of Legal Aid's Civil and Juvenile Practices revealed a similar trend, with lawyers exiting to jobs in city and state government.”
The organization did not respond to a request for comparable retention figures for Corporation Counsel lawyers.
At a City Council hearing held last October at which defender organization representatives and staff testified about lack of pay, Councilman Rory Lancman, chair of the Committee on the Justice System, publicly compared public defender and Corporation Counsel salaries, according to a Law360 report.
Lancman reportedly said beginning public defender pay ranged from $61,000 to $68,000, whereas Corporation Counsel lawyers started at $68,000. He also reportedly stated that defenders earn between $70,000 and $78,000 at the five-year point, whereas Corporation Counsel lawyers make $79,000.
In regard to starting salaries, recent graduates working for Legal Aid straight out of law school and who are awaiting bar exam results are paid $53,582; and upon passing the bar, their pay jumps to $62,730, according to a Law Journal story from last June. Corporation Counsel salaries start at $68,494, the Law Journal report also noted.
In addition, in June, Tina Luongo, attorney-in-charge for the criminal defense practice at Legal Aid, said that the group receives a $108 million appropriation from the city for indigent legal defense and that appropriation had remained flat for the last six fiscal years.
Legal Aid, in its news release, also pointed to the October hearing, recounting how defender organization representatives and staff shared personal stories about how lack of pay had made their lives and jobs difficult—from making it harder to raise a family locally to having problems continuing to pursue their service careers.
Legal Aid also said that the representatives and staff had testified that pay disparity with their Corporation Counsel counterparts was sending a message that “their work and mandate is less important than that of the job performed by their adversaries.”
The organization specifically called for the City Council to prioritize public defender pay parity in the fiscal year 2020 budget.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250