NY Lawmakers Mull Monetary Bail, 'Dangerousness' as Differences Remain
Lawmakers are working to come to a deal on criminal justice reform, which is expected to include major changes to the state's laws on bail, by the time the state budget is due at the end of the coming weekend.
March 25, 2019 at 05:40 PM
4 minute read
Democrats in New York remain divided on how they plan to overhaul the state's current system on cash bail, with sources familiar with the negotiations saying that a final bill could still include a monetary component despite repeated calls to take money out of bail altogether this year.
Lawmakers are working to come to a deal on criminal justice reform, which is expected to include major changes to the state's laws on bail, by the time the state budget is due at the end of the coming weekend.
It's unclear what the final package will look like, but lawmakers said Monday that a major sticking point on bail reform remains the concept of dangerousness, which would essentially allow a judge to decide whether a defendant is a threat to public safety while determining if they should be held in jail before their trial.
Judges in New York don't currently take into account that factor when deciding what should happen to a defendant after arraignment. Democrats in the state Assembly involved with discussions on bail oppose adding it to the list of factors judges could consider as part of a new law on pretrial detention.
“We still believe that the whole essence of bail was to ensure that people showed up and it was to deal with flight risk,” Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said Monday. “So there is a concern about judging whether people should show up based on some view of who and what they are. If the requirement is for people to show up, that's what we should really be basing things on—people's ability to show up.”
Sources familiar with the ongoing negotiations over bail reform said Monday that lawmakers are even considering allowing monetary bail to remain to some degree, but it's unclear what that would look like.
A bill introduced last year by Assemblywoman Latrice Walker, D-Brooklyn, would have kept cash bail for more serious crimes. Walker, who is considered a point person on bail in the Assembly, is strongly opposed to allowing dangerousness in any reform. Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is pushing lawmakers to resolve differences on bail over the next week, has declined to take a position on the inclusion of dangerousness.
Democrats in the Senate, meanwhile, have coalesced around a bill form state Sen. Michael Gianaris, D-Queens, that would do away with the monetary component altogether. Walker said Monday that everyone's proposals are still being considered.
“All of the proposals are on the table and, sort of, being thrown against the wall,” Walker said. “At this point, we're still where we've always been.”
Heastie said the same when asked for an update on bail reform after a meeting with Cuomo and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester, on Monday.
“Everything that's been on the table is still on the table,” Heastie said.
In terms of three-way negotiations between legislative leaders and Cuomo, the burden would be on the Assembly to show that cash bail, to some extent, should remain. Both Cuomo and Gianaris have said they want monetary bail eliminated altogether. When asked if preserving a monetary component to bail was still on the table Monday, Gianaris said he would still be opposed.
“That's not the goal,” Gianaris said. “Talks are continuing, differences are getting narrower, and we're almost there.”
There are also Democrats in the Assembly that don't want to see cash bail continued in any form, but the position of the conference may not reflect that. Even Heastie, in February, said he supports “a 100 percent ending of a cash bail system.”
There have been scant updates on criminal justice reform in recent weeks as the Legislature continues to figure out where they'll land on bail reform, but lawmakers have said changes to the state's laws on criminal discovery and the right to a speedy trial are all but settled.
Lawmakers are expected to work through the week, and likely the weekend, to come to a resolution on the state budget, which Cuomo has said he won't approve without those reforms included. The budget is due by the end of the day Sunday.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Remembering Ted Olson
- 2Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 3Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 4Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250