Prosecutors Announce Charges Against Attorney Michael Avenatti
Michael Avenatti is being charged in Manhattan and Los Angeles federal court, with SDNY prosecutors alleging four extortion-related counts connected to an attempt to shake down Nike for millions, and Central District of California prosecutors charging him with bank fraud and stealing from clients.
March 25, 2019 at 01:31 PM
6 minute read
Attorney Michael Avenatti is facing criminal charges on both coasts, after prosecutors in Los Angeles and Manhattan unveiled separate indictments accusing the high-profile attorney of attempting to extort athletic apparel giant Nike and multiple financial fraud claims related to embezzlement of a client's money as well as bank fraud.
Avenatti was arrested early Monday afternoon in Manhattan, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York told the Law Journal.
According to Manhattan prosecutors, Avenatti and an unnamed co-conspirator attempted to shake down Nike over allegations of misconduct being lodged by a client of Avenatti. Federal authorities claim that Avenatti and the unnamed co-conspirator met with attorneys for Nike on March 19 in New York.
This included outside counsel from Boies Schiller Flexner, the company confirmed. The co-conspirator was identified as attorney Mark Geragos in news reports. While Geragos has not been charged, he is being represented in the matter by attorney Benjamin Brafman, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
Los Angeles federal prosecutors charged Avenatti with embezzling from clients and misleading a bank about his income in order to get a loan.
In the alleged extortion scheme, Southern District of New York prosecutors claim Avenatti told Nike representatives that his client, a basketball coach in California, had evidence Nike employees had made payments to top high-school basketball players. The evidence was supposedly similar to the kind that led to recent prosecutions against Adidas in the Southern District.
Avenatti threatened to hold a press conference about the alleged misconduct by Nike ahead of this year's annual National Collegiate Athletic Association men's basketball tournament and a quarterly corporate earnings call around the same time, thus maximizing the potential damage to the company, according to prosecutors.
The press conference could be avoided if Nike paid the basketball coach $1.5 million as part of a settlement over claims in an unrelated dispute over a sponsorship deal of the coach's team, prosecutors claim Avenatti informed the company. Additionally, Avenatti and the co-conspirator would need to be hired to conduct an internal investigation of Nike, and if they hired a different firm, the company would still need to pay the pair of attorneys at least twice the fees of any firm that was hired, prosecutors allege.
In a follow-up call March 20 that law enforcement was monitoring, the attorneys for Nike tried to push back the deadline for deciding about the arrangement. Another call later in the day that was also monitored included Avenatti. On the call, federal authorities claim Avenatti made it clear he was expecting to be paid at least $10 million by Nike to keep the press conference from happening.
“I'll go and I'll go take $10 billion dollars off our client's market cap,” federal authorities quote Avenatti as stating to the attorneys for Nike. “But I'm not fucking around.”
The following day, at an in-person meeting with attorneys for Nike that was recorded, Avenatti allegedly said a $12 million retainer needed to be paid immediately, which would go toward a minimum of $15 million in billings, that could go as high as $25 million ultimately unless, as Avenatti is claimed to have said, “the scope changes.” Avenatti also appeared to suggest that if the company was willing to pay $22.5 million as part of a confidential settlement with his client, he and the co-conspirator would “ride off into the sunset.”
Avenatti had been scheduled to meet again with the Nike attorneys on Monday.
In a statement, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York said that regardless of how Avenatti wanted to characterize the payouts by Nike, it was in reality a shakedown.
“When lawyers use their law licenses as weapons, as a guise to extort payments for themselves, they are no longer acting as attorneys,” Berman said. “They are acting as criminals, and they will held responsible for their conduct.”
In a statement sent by a spokesman, the company acknowledged it was in communication with federal authorities in Manhattan related to the investigation into college basketball payments for over a year. When the company became aware of the current matter, it says it immediately flagged it for federal authorities.
“Nike will not be extorted or hide information that is relevant to a government investigation,” the company statement said. “Nike firmly believes in ethical and fair play, both in business and sports, and will continue to assist the prosecutors.”
In California, Avenatti faces wire and bank fraud charges related to a failed coffee business venture. According to prosecutors in the Central District of California, Avenatti allegedly dodged a $1.6 million settlement with a client over the previous misappropriation of funds to pay for expenses for the operation of Tully's Coffee stores in California and Washington state. The settlement was due in January 2018, but prosecutors claim Avenatti never actually paid.
Avenatti is further alleged to have submitted false tax returns to a bank in Mississippi in 2014 in order to obtain more than $4.1 million loans for his law firm and coffee business. Avenatti sent the bank tax returns that authorities claim he never actually filed, showing he made tens of millions of dollars between 2011 and 2013, while also paying millions in taxes. Officials say Avenatti still owed the IRS more than $850,000 in back taxes at the time.
In a press conference streamed over Facebook on Monday, Los Angeles US Attorney Nick Hanna noted that Avenatti's Twitter handle says that he is an “Attorney, Advocate, Fighter for Good.” Hanna said that the allegations in the complaint, however, reveal him to be “a corrupt lawyer who instead fights for his own selfish interests.”
Hanna also made clear the Manhattan and Los Angeles prosecutions were “two completely separate” cases and that they were coordinated for arrest purposes.
Avenatti rose to national prominence for his legal representation of adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, who performed under the name Stormy Daniels, in her claim she was paid thousands of dollars during the 2016 presidential campaign to keep quiet about an earlier sexual affair with Donald Trump. Avenatti rode the visibility in the case to position himself as a public nemesis to Trump and his then-attorney and “fixer,” Michael Cohen.
An attorney for Avenatti could not be immediately reached for comment. Avenatti himself did not respond to a request for comment.
Avenatti is expected to appear U.S. Magistrate Judge Katharine Parker later on Monday.
Read the CDCA Complaint:
Read the SDNY Complaint:
Additional reporting by Ross Todd.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250