The plaintiffs had attempted to acquire part of the defendants adjoining real property by adverse possession. That claim was denied and their complaint was dismissed. However, the defendants were granted summary judgment on their counterclaim for trespassing. The court found that the plaintiffs had “cut down at least one tree on the defendant’s property.”

Following a hearing, which included testimony of the parties, their arborists/tree experts and a surveyor, the court awarded the defendants damages in the amount of $50,250.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]