Cuomo, Lawmakers Set to Reduce Misdemeanor Sentence to Prevent Deportation
The proposal was included in the first of many bills expected to be introduced Thursday night that will eventually make up the entirety of the state budget, which lawmakers are set to pass on Sunday.
March 28, 2019 at 11:23 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo and lawmakers in New York are set to advance legislation as part of the state budget to protect undocumented immigrants convicted of Class A misdemeanors from deportation by limiting the maximum sentence for those charges to 364 days—rather than one year.
The proposal was included in the first of many bills expected to be introduced Thursday night that will eventually make up the entirety of the state budget, which lawmakers are set to pass on Sunday.
The one-day sentence reduction for Class A misdemeanors will allow undocumented immigrants to avoid triggering deportation proceedings, which can begin when a defendant is handed a sentence of one year or longer.
The idea has been proposed by Assemblyman Marcos Crespo, D-Bronx, for the last three years but hadn't made much progress during that time. Cuomo included it in his executive budget proposal in January, after which it gained support among more Democrats in the Legislature.
Chances of the bill becoming law in years past were unlikely because Republicans controlled the state Senate. Democrats took a firm majority in the chamber this year for the first time in nearly a decade, which breathed new life into the legislation. It's sponsored in the Senate by state Sen. Jessica Ramos, D-Queens.
The text of the bill is relatively straightforward. It would change the state penal law to reduce the maximum sentence for Class A misdemeanors in New York to 364 days. A few examples of charges at that level include petit larceny and endangering the welfare of a child, but there are countless other offenses with that status.
It also would benefit undocumented immigrants who received a one-year sentence on Class A misdemeanor charges before the bill became law. The legislation provides that anyone sentenced to one year in jail on a Class A misdemeanor charge before that time will have their sentence automatically reduced to 364 days.
The bill also would allow defendants to ask the court to set aside their sentence if “collateral consequences,” such as a risk of deportation, were involved. That would be useful in cases where an immigrant chose to forego negotiating with prosecutors on a plea deal to have the charges against them reduced.
Defendants often take plea deals to have the charges against them, and consequently the sentence, reduced. In the case of undocumented immigrants, they may have been faced with deportation anyway, if they chose to plead a more serious charge down to a Class A misdemeanor. The legislation will allow immigrants to plead charges down without that risk of deportation.
The legislation also would allow judges, with the consent of prosecutors, to vacate or modify the judgment against a defendant. They could also allow a new trial wherein the defendant would enter a plea to the same offense so the court could apply a lower sentence.
The bill was supported by Albany County District Attorney David Soares, who is president of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York. Soares said in an interview in February with the New York Law Journal that it was a “no-brainer” for him, personally.
The legislation was supported by the New York City Bar Association, which issued a report supporting it in 2018. The bill is expected to be approved by lawmakers as part of the state budget Sunday evening.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250