Hogan Lovells Prepares for Move Into 'Bold' New Manhattan Office
ALM obtained a sneak peek of the office construction earlier this month.
March 28, 2019 at 02:54 PM
2 minute read
T-minus one month. That's how long it is until the New York office of Hogan Lovells leaves its Third Avenue space for new digs at 390 Madison. Workers are now busy preparing the space for the opening. ALM obtained a sneak peek of the office construction this month, including when artist Chris Natrop and his team were installing a full wall art display. When ready, the office promises to be a whole new experience for Hogan Lovells attorneys and staff. Some of the design elements might seem familiar to anyone who's visited a chic new law firm office. Natural light is the order of the day. Elevator banks are out; central stairways are in. No more going down to street level for a breath of fresh air; lawyers and staff can simply step onto one of the office's terraces. But Arlene Chow, a partner at the firm who led its design committee, said some things might surprise you. While the space is technically six floors, it is chock-full of double and even triple-height common areas—even a hidden terrace—for lawyers, staff and visitors to explore. The open floor plan isn't a sea of cubicles below eight-foot drop ceilings. Blue, green and yellow tile walls accentuate a stairway, a cafe and the reception area. The centerpiece of one of the unusual spaces is a giant wall-mounted artwork by Natrop, a Los Angeles-based artist who was at work when ALM visited. While a stereotypical law firm might pick art that shows off its "understated sophistication," Chow said, Natrop's work is emblematic of the attitude that Hogan Lovells wants to project. "It's professional, but at the same time, it's energetic," she said. "We're trying to send a message that we're not staid and conservative; we're bold." While the firm considered moving to Hudson Yards or the World Trade Center, Chow said it ultimately settled on 390 Madison, which is not technically a new building but a renovated one, partly because of its proximity to Grand Central Terminal. The architecture firm Studios came out ahead of its competitors with its plans for the space, she added. The firm declined to state the build-out's cost. The office project was originally slated to be done in December, but a bit of delay is par for the course in New York City construction, Chow noted. "Even my kitchen had a couple months' delay," she quipped.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
Pelotons, Gym, Napping Rooms: Latest Law Firm Renovations 'Draw People' In with Home Amenities
4 minute readDonning the 'Dissent Chain': Asian American Judges Group Honors Judicial Leaders With Unorthodox Trophies
85-Year-Old New York Court Officer Retires After 62 Years of Service
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250