New Wage-and-Hour Lawsuit Seeks Back Pay for Bloomberg Data Analysts
The Jane Doe plaintiff's claims are just the latest overtime litigation the company faces, even as it finalizes settlement talks in a separate but similar suit in the Southern District of New York.
April 03, 2019 at 03:40 PM
3 minute read
Bloomberg L.P. is facing another legal battle in Manhattan federal court over its overtime policies. The class action filing, by an unnamed “Jane Doe” plaintiff, claims that, even as the company has worked to properly classify employees who are eligible for overtime as such, the unit she works in was not provided allegedly required retroactive pay.
The suit is the latest Fair Labor Standards Act claim brought against the media and finance data company by Getman Sweeney Dunn name attorney Dan Getman and his firm. According to Getman, the suit is the sixth brought against the company since 2012.
The sparse eight-page complaint was filed on behalf of data analysts and specialists in Bloomberg's global data division. According to the complaint, the company recognized that the positions in the division were not among those exempt from overtime. However, Bloomberg allegedly made no effort to calculate back pay and liquidated damages for those employees, as they are required to by law.
“I think Bloomberg has had ample opportunity and ample reason to realize that many classes of its work force, many divisions and groups of workers, should have been paid overtime a long ago,” Getman told the Law Journal. “I think that's why they came around on reclassifying the position in global data.”
The plaintiff, a current employee, stated that she's worked for the company since 2014 out of the global data division office located in Princeton, New Jersey. The complaint states that Bloomberg employs hundreds of people in the data division under the job titles, and that the class would be “well more” than a thousand people. The employees are responsible for updating the Bloomberg terminals, as well as Bloomberg Law and other platforms, according to the complaint.
Employees in the division regularly work over 40 hours in a week, the complaint states, often being required to do so to complete work assigned to them. This often means working through lunch breaks, as well as it home.
The Doe suit comes as settlement talks in a separate suit over the same issues are currently commencing before U.S. District Judge Richard Berman of the Southern District of New York. That suit, Martinez v. Bloomberg LP, was filed on behalf of employees in the company's customer support center responsible for helping customers with the installation of Bloomberg products and services.
In March, Jones Day partner Terri Chase alerted the court on behalf of Bloomberg that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The parties are due back April 9 to finalize the settlement before Berman.
Chase did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Doe suit.
A spokesman for Bloomberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250