Schlam Stone Litigation Partners Launch Same-Day Arbitration Business
The partners, Erik Groothuis and Jonathan Mazer, believe the venture can become a go-to alternative for small businesses that might otherwise abandon—or never bring—smaller-amount commercial claims that are viewed as too costly to litigate in light of the expected recovery.
April 03, 2019 at 10:16 AM
4 minute read
(Photo: shutterstock.com)
Aiming to solve the problem of small businesses dropping smaller-amount commercial contract disputes because of the expense of litigation, two Schlam Stone & Dolan partners have launched a one-day arbitration business called the Same-Day Justice Program.
The partners, Erik Groothuis and Jonathan Mazer, believe the venture can become a go-to alternative for small businesses that might otherwise abandon—or never bring—commercial claims for small sums, such as those targeting service providers or vendors that have allegedly failed to provide on-time services or deliver sufficient-quality merchandise.
Groothuis is a 20-year commercial litigator at Schlam Stone, a boutique litigation firm in Manhattan. He said he came up with the arbitration idea last November after years of watching smaller clients give up on legal claims—often against service providers and vendors—because the litigation process and its costs outweighed any hoped-for recovery.
“Too many companies walk away from a valid claim in a contract dispute,” he said in a news release issued Tuesday on the same-day program.
In a phone interview Tuesday evening, Groothuis said he thinks “there is an underserved part of the market” for arbitrated resolution of business disputes. He also noted that one-day arbitrations would be unique. He's not heard of one-day turnarounds, he said, and most commercial arbitrations last months. The Same-Day Justice Program, he also said, will aim to primarily tackle commercial disputes valued between $50,000 and $500,000.
Moreover, Groothuis said that he and Mazer believe the same-day arbitrations will become a new avenue of business for commercial practitioners who would otherwise represent an aggrieved business but who turn down the client because the amount claimed is too low relative to their legal fees.
The business venture, which is currently being run through the Schlam Stone firm but that is expected be spun off into a separate entity—and which is yet to have its first clients—is set up to operate about as cost-effectively as could be designed, Groothuis maintains.
Two businesses stuck in elongated and expensive litigation can opt for the Same-Day Justice Program to resolve the dispute, Groothuis said. Or, its use can be agreed to beforehand and made part of a contract's alternative dispute resolution clause. (The same-day program's website, launched at the start of this year, provides example ADR language to be used.)
Once both parties agree to use the program, either Mazer, a veteran trial lawyer with years of arbitration and mediation experience, or litigator Groothuis, will handle the arbitration in a day, they said.
The parties will pay a flat fee for a half-day or full day of private, neutral arbitration, said Groothuis and Mazer in the news release. Then the arbitration hearing will take place in person—unless the parties agree to handling it remotely—and it will typically be held in Schlam Stone's offices.
The parties will bring all of their evidence—documents and witnesses—to the hearing. And before that date they will exchange the documents they intend to use, as well as a list of the witnesses they'll call, the news release explained.
At the hearing, the parties can present their case in any manner they choose, whether by narrative or in question-and-answer format, added Groothuis and Mazer.
The same-day arbitrator will issue a written decision that day, and—as agreed to beforehand—the decision will be enforceable in court.
Groothuis also noted in the news release that he thinks the one-day alternative is “particularly appropriate for companies in real estate, construction, wholesale, retail and other B-to-B sectors.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/50/bc/4e6f026045ef9acf79079dd513f4/daniel-gitner1-767x633.jpg)
![How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/08/74/d52420804282a7dfc379a3c57b89/human-resources-767x633-10.jpg)
How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute read![Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2021/09/bigstock-U-s-Department-Of-Homeland-Se-25861103-767x633.jpg)
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250