NY City Council Passes '$1 Bail' Legislation to Address Jail 'Horror Stories'
“We've heard too many horror stories of people stuck on Rikers Island because of confusion or a communication breakdown over $1 bail—and that ends today,” Council Member Rory Lancman, a Democrat who introduced the legislation, said.
April 09, 2019 at 06:26 PM
3 minute read
The New York City Council announced Tuesday its passage of legislation that will require the city Department of Correction to inform those behind bars and their lawyers when the person detained is there solely because they owe a $1 bail or some amount less than $10.
The legislation passage comes less than two weeks after state lawmakers and Gov. Andrew Cuomo agreed to a state budget that includes sweeping reforms to the state's criminal justice system, including an end to cash bail for most criminal charges.
Council Member Rory Lancman, a Democrat who represents the 24th District, covering parts of Queens, introduced the legislation, Intro. 944, in an effort to tackle what he called in a City Council news release Tuesday “part of the nightmare of cash bail.”
“We've heard too many horror stories of people stuck on Rikers Island because of confusion or a communication breakdown over $1 bail—and that ends today,” Lancman also said in his statement.
The news release further pointed to a DOC report that said 149 individuals were held on $1 bail from August 2018 through December 2018.
In addition, it explained that $1 bail is set when a criminal defendant has at least one other case pending that would keep him or her from being released. The $1 bail serves as an accounting mechanism to ensure that the person gets credit for all time they serve in a city jail, the council said.
Then they added that the DOC's failure to communicate with both jailed defendants and their lawyers “has led to unnecessary and expensive incarceration.”
The council further noted in the news release that “public defenders [had] testified to the City Council that the process to release individuals—after $1 bail has been paid—is littered with delays that can take hours.”
The City Council's news release also stated that New York City had “claimed that it created 'a $1 bail alert to notify both court personnel and the defense attorney when a defendant may be held solely due to $1 bail,'” but, the council continued, “the $1 bail alert the city was touting was not actually operational, and, as DOC testified in December 2018, only incarcerated individuals were being notified about $1 bail.”
The new legislation “will significantly enhance communication and implement a new structure for $1 bail,” the council added.
Elena Weissmann, director at The Bronx Freedom Fund, said in the statement, “For New Yorkers to languish in jail on $1 is unconscionable. The fact that we're still trying to work around the $1 bail issue so low-income New Yorkers are not needlessly incarcerated pretrial, highlights the absurdity of the larger cash bail system.”
Added Amanda Lawson, founding director of the Dollar Bail Brigade, “Our movement of nearly 1,000 New Yorkers, who have been moved by the urgency of this issue to give their time and energy to posting these $1 bails and getting our neighbors out of pretrial jail cells, represents a widespread recognition of the inherent injustices of bail and pretrial detention and the need for change.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
7 minute readNot All Secrets Are Trade Secrets: SDNY Examines the Limits of NDA Protection
13 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
- 2From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
- 5‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250