NY City Council Passes '$1 Bail' Legislation to Address Jail 'Horror Stories'
“We've heard too many horror stories of people stuck on Rikers Island because of confusion or a communication breakdown over $1 bail—and that ends today,” Council Member Rory Lancman, a Democrat who introduced the legislation, said.
April 09, 2019 at 06:26 PM
3 minute read
The New York City Council announced Tuesday its passage of legislation that will require the city Department of Correction to inform those behind bars and their lawyers when the person detained is there solely because they owe a $1 bail or some amount less than $10.
The legislation passage comes less than two weeks after state lawmakers and Gov. Andrew Cuomo agreed to a state budget that includes sweeping reforms to the state's criminal justice system, including an end to cash bail for most criminal charges.
Council Member Rory Lancman, a Democrat who represents the 24th District, covering parts of Queens, introduced the legislation, Intro. 944, in an effort to tackle what he called in a City Council news release Tuesday “part of the nightmare of cash bail.”
“We've heard too many horror stories of people stuck on Rikers Island because of confusion or a communication breakdown over $1 bail—and that ends today,” Lancman also said in his statement.
The news release further pointed to a DOC report that said 149 individuals were held on $1 bail from August 2018 through December 2018.
In addition, it explained that $1 bail is set when a criminal defendant has at least one other case pending that would keep him or her from being released. The $1 bail serves as an accounting mechanism to ensure that the person gets credit for all time they serve in a city jail, the council said.
Then they added that the DOC's failure to communicate with both jailed defendants and their lawyers “has led to unnecessary and expensive incarceration.”
The council further noted in the news release that “public defenders [had] testified to the City Council that the process to release individuals—after $1 bail has been paid—is littered with delays that can take hours.”
The City Council's news release also stated that New York City had “claimed that it created 'a $1 bail alert to notify both court personnel and the defense attorney when a defendant may be held solely due to $1 bail,'” but, the council continued, “the $1 bail alert the city was touting was not actually operational, and, as DOC testified in December 2018, only incarcerated individuals were being notified about $1 bail.”
The new legislation “will significantly enhance communication and implement a new structure for $1 bail,” the council added.
Elena Weissmann, director at The Bronx Freedom Fund, said in the statement, “For New Yorkers to languish in jail on $1 is unconscionable. The fact that we're still trying to work around the $1 bail issue so low-income New Yorkers are not needlessly incarcerated pretrial, highlights the absurdity of the larger cash bail system.”
Added Amanda Lawson, founding director of the Dollar Bail Brigade, “Our movement of nearly 1,000 New Yorkers, who have been moved by the urgency of this issue to give their time and energy to posting these $1 bails and getting our neighbors out of pretrial jail cells, represents a widespread recognition of the inherent injustices of bail and pretrial detention and the need for change.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250