NY Magistrates Association Calls Report on Plight of Poor Defendants Flawed
The members of the New York State Magistrates Association stand ready to address real concerns in a collaborative and objective manner, devoid of the unsupported attacks based upon a preconceived bias.
April 12, 2019 at 12:25 PM
3 minute read
On behalf of the 2,100 town and village judges who are members of the New York State Magistrates Association, we are appalled by the openly biased and poorly supported report released on April 3 by The Fund for Modern Courts entitled, “Fines and Fees and Jail Time in New York Town and Village Justice Courts: The Unseen Violations of Constitutional and State Law.”
The report, which begins with a conclusion, then uses flawed, outdated information to support its conclusion, is part of an ongoing effort by the New York City-based Fund for Modern Courts to discredit our state's constitutionally-supported local justice system, which serves the towns and villages of Upstate New York.
To support its supposition that town and village justices treat defendants with insufficient funds unfairly, the report conveniently cherry picks years-old data from the State Commission on Judicial Conduct and a 2006 Action Plan for Justice Courts, a document that is now 13 years old.
While the report acknowledges that the issuance of warrants and the jailing of individuals for non-payment of fines, fees and surcharges routinely occurs in city courts throughout our state, the report chooses only to focus on data points related to town and village courts. In 2017, for example, the commission reported that 84% of all complaints were lodged against city and state-level judges, not town and village justices, a fact that was not mentioned in the report.
The sampling used to support the findings was flawed as well. The majority of the data collected to support the report originates from a survey of public defenders and defense attorneys–-based upon questions developed to elicit the data to support its conclusion. In addition, there is absolutely no indication of the geographical sampling pool or size, and there was no apparent sampling of other interested stakeholders.
Lastly, any conversation about improving how our justice system handles defendants with insufficient funds needs to include a review of mandates. Our judges have advocated for changes to the mandatory fine, surcharge and fee structures imposed upon the courts by the state. Mandatory surcharges are often higher than the actual fines in some cases and lift fees for suspended tickets can be as high as $70. The report fails to make any recommendations to alleviate these monetary dictates upon our judges.
The members of the New York State Magistrates Association stand ready to address real concerns in a collaborative and objective manner, devoid of the unsupported attacks based upon a preconceived bias.
Town Justice Tanja Sirago is the executive director of the New York State Magistrates Association.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readAllowing Elections Boards to Count Absentee Ballots Early Benefits Voters
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250