Investor Lawsuit Seeks Clawback of Short-Swing Sale Profits of Biopharma Stocks
The complaint claims that the managing director of a U.K.-based bioscience investment firm operated as an insider when he directed over $400,000 worth of sales in a biopharmaceutical company's securities in less than a six-month period.
April 15, 2019 at 07:20 PM
3 minute read
A managing partner of a United Kingdom-based bioscience investment firm is facing a securities clawback action by an investor in the biopharmaceutical company CymaBay Therapeutics who claims his insider status prevents him from holding on to $400,000 worth of short-swing profits.
Abingworth managing partner Kurt von Emster, who is based in California, is alleged by the investor to have been an insider at CymaBay for the purpose of security law. Because of his position helping to manage Abingworth's CymaBay investments while serving as a director and fiduciary at the company, the plaintiffs claim he is liable under the security law.
According to the complaint, von Emster oversaw transactions of CymaBay securities within a six-month period, resulting in a short-swing profit of approximately $448,000. Yet the plaintiffs claim von Emster has personally disgorged only $692 to the company to date.
Von Emster was statutorily prohibited from exploiting his fiduciary position to realize short-swing trading profits, the complaint contends, either for his own benefit, or for the benefit of the funds he oversaw at Abingworth. While serving as a so-called independent director at CymaBay, von Emster directed Abingworth to purchase as much as $4.5 million worth of stock in CymaBay in July 2015.
Between October 2017 and February 2018, von Emster reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that Abingworth had executed a number of securities transactions that, according to the plaintiffs, represented short-swing selling. Yet Section 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act “strictly prohibits the realization of profits from purchases and sales within six-month periods, irrespective of the insider's intent, and including for violations that are 'pre-planned,'” the complaint states.
“Nonetheless, Abingworth's adoption of an insider trading plan evidences Abingworth's acknowledgment of the 'insider' access and privileged trading position enjoyed by Abingworth … for purposes of the insider trading restrictions imposed” by the Exchange Act, the complaint contends.
The plaintiff, Aaron Rubenstein of Rhode Island, is represented by attorney Miriam Tauber. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A request for comment on the matter from a representative at Abingworth was likewise not immediately returned.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250